Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

R. Mohanasundaram(Dead) Thr. Lrs. vs Arulmigu Kolavizhi Amman Temple And ... on 1 May, 2015

Author: R.K. Agrawal

Bench: R.K. Agrawal

     ITEM NO.9                                 COURT NO.3                        SECTION XII

                                  S U P R E M E C O U R T O F               I N D I A
                                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     I.A. No. 4/2014, I.A. No. 5/2014, I.A. No. 6/2014, I.A. No. 7/2014,
     I.A. 8/2015, I.A. 9/2015 in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal
     (C) No.13116/2012

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30/11/2011
     in OSA No. 318/2008 passed by the High Court of Madras)

     R. MOHANASUNDARAM                                                             Petitioner(s)

                                                          VERSUS

     ARULMIGU KOLAVIZHI AMMAN TEMPLE & ORS.                                        Respondent(s)

     (for substitution and c/delay in filing substitution appln. and
     setting aside an abatement)

     Date : 01/05/2015 This application was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL
                                             [IN CHAMBERS]


     For Petitioner(s)                     Mr. R. Ayyam Perumal,Adv.
                                           Ms. Enakshi Mukhopadhyay, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)                     Mr. M. A. Chinnasamy,Adv.

                                            Mr. M.V. Rama, Adv.
                                            M/s. K. Ramkumar & Associates,Adv.

                            UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                               O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the applicant. The abatement is set aside.

The delay of 598 days and 1869 days in filing the substitution application of deceased respondent no. 2 in I.A. No. 4 of 2014 and deceased respondent no. 3 in I.A. no. 7 of 2014 has sufficiently been explained. The delay is Signature Not Verified condoned. The applications for condonation of delay in Digitally signed by Rajni Mukhi Date: 2015.05.06 12:52:59 IST filing substitution applications are allowed.

Reason:

Respondent no.2 and 3 have died on 28.11.2011 and 4.9.2008 respectively leaving behind their legal heirs as mentioned in para 4 of I.A. Nos. 4 and 7 of 2014. There is no opposition to the applications seeking substitution to bring on record the Lrs. of deceased respondent nos. 2 and 3. Applications for substitution are allowed.

The names of respondent nos. 2 and 3 be deleted from the array of parties and in their place the names of Lrs. of deceased respondent nos. 2 and 3 mentioned para 4 of I.A. Nos. 4 and 7 of 2014 be substituted.

Cause title be amended accordingly.

(Rajni Mukhi)                           (Pardeep Kumar)
   Sr. P.A.                               AR-cum-PS