Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Shri. Abdul Aziz Suleman Shaikh (Since ... vs Shri. Bhagirah Chhabildas Ponda on 14 November, 2022

Author: Madhav J. Jamdar

Bench: Madhav J. Jamdar

                                                                                               1-wp-4047-2017.doc


                              Pallavi
                                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
PALLAVI
           Digitally signed
           by PALLAVI
           MAHENDRA
           WARGAONKAR
                                                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MAHENDRA
WARGAONKAR Date:
           2022.11.14
           17:47:39
           +0530



                                                         WRIT PETITION NO.4047 OF 2017


                                        Shri. Abdul Aziz Suleman Shaikh
                                        (Since deceased) Through LRs.                       ...Petitioner
                                              Versus
                                        Shri. Bhagirath Chhabildas Ponda                    ...Respondent
                                                                    --------------
                                        Mr. Atul Damle, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Rupesh
                                        Lanjekar, for the Petitioner.
                                        Mr. C.G. Gavnekar with Mr. Ashutosh Gavnekar, for
                                        Respondent.
                                                                      ---------------

                                                                 CORAM:         MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
                                                                 DATE:          NOVEMBER 14, 2022

                                        P.C.:

1. Heard Mr. Atul Damle, learned Senior Advocate for the Petitioner and Mr. Gavnekar, learned Advocate for the Respondent.

2. At the outset, Mr. Damle, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Petitioners states that he has instructions to withdraw the Petition. Accordingly, the Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) 1