Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Jagdish vs Bank Of Baroda on 30 August, 2010

                        dsUnzh; lwpuk vk;ksx
                               Central Information Commission
            Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ Club Building, Near Post Office
                   iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj / Old J.N.U. Campus
                    ubZ fnYyh ­ 110067 / New Delhi - 110067
                                     (Ph:  011­26160943)
                                         *****


                                                             No.CIC/SM/C/2010/000665
                                                                                                 
                                                                       Dated:  30 August 2010


Name of the Complainant               :     Shri Jagdish
                                            S/o. Shri Dipti Lal,
                                            Khagarjit Nagar,
                                            Mainpuri, U.P.


Name of the Public Authority          :     The Branch Manager,
                                            Bank of Baroda,
                                            Mainpuri, UP.


                                            The Central Public Information Officer,
                                            Bank of Baroda, P B No 198, 
                                            Jeevan Bhavan, 45, Hazaratganj, 
                                            Lucknow - 226001.

                                          ORDER

          The Commission has received a petition from Shri Jagdish of Mainpuri,  stating that his RTI­application of 31 October 2009 filed with the Central Public  Information  Officer, Bank of  Baroda,  Mainpuri,  Uttar Pradesh,  has  not been  responded to within the  time limit prescribed under the  Right to  Information  (RTI) Act, 2005.  A copy of his RTI­application is enclosed for ready reference.

2.        The Commission has decided to treat this petition as a complaint under  Section   18   of   the   RTI­Act,   2005,   and   hereby   directs   the   CPIO/Public  Information Officer,  Bank of Baroda, Mainpuri, Uttar Pradesh, to provide the  information sought by the Complainant by 24 September 2010. 

3.        Since the PIO has failed to respond to the RTI­application mentioned  above in time, he is, therefore, required to send his explanation in writing by 30  September 2010 to Show Cause as to why a maximum penalty of Rs.25000/­  for the delay in supply of information may not be levied upon him.   If no written  explanation is received from the CPIO by 30 September 2010, the Commission  will   decide   the   case   ex­parte   and   would   impose   the   maximum   penalty  prescribed under Section 20(1) of the  Right to Information (RTI) Act, i.e., Rs.  25,000/­, upon the CPIO/deemed PIO. If, however, the CPIO had responded in  time and provided the desired information, please let us know at the earliest.

4.               The Complainant is advised that in case he does not receive any  information from the CPIO after this order of the Commission, he may write to  the Commission against the non­compliance of the Commission's orders.

5.     The Commission ordered accordingly.

(Satyananda Mishra) Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy:

(Vijay Bhalla) Assistant Registrar Cc:
1.     Shri Jagdish, S/o. Shri Dipti Lal, Khagarjit Nagar, Mainpuri, U.P.
2.     The Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda, Mainpuri, UP.
3.     The Central Public Information Officer, Bank of Baroda, P B No 198, Jeevan Bhavan, 45,  Hazaratganj, Lucknow - 226001.