Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Nidhi Gupta & Anr vs State & Anr on 11 December, 2017

Author: Gopal Krishan Vyas

Bench: Gopal Krishan Vyas

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR

               S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 637 / 2017

1. Nidhi Gupta D/o Rajendra Prasad Gupta

2. Rahul Gupta S/o Rajendra Prasad Gupta, Both Managing
Director & Director of M/s Range Power Experts Private Limited,
4th Floor, Sheelmohar Plaza, Yudhisther Marg, C-scheme, Jaipur

                                                         ----Petitioners

                                  Versus

1. State of Rajasthan

2. Viswas Sharma S/o Vishnu Dutt Sharma, Resident of House No.
275, 1st b Road, Sardarpura, Police Station Sardarpura, Jodhpur.

                                                      ----Respondents

_____________________________________________________

For Petitioner(s)     :   Mr. Mahesh Bora, Sr. Advocate assisted with

                          Mr. Parinay Deep Shah.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Rajpurohit, PP.

                          Mr. Farzand Ali, for the complainant.
_____________________________________________________

        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS

Order 11/12/2017 On last date of hearing, an order was made by this court to keep the Investigating Officer present in the Court on next date of hearing.

Learned public prosecutor submits that although investigation was conducted, but file was transferred for further investigation to CID CB, therefore, the Investigating Officer is not present today.

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-637/2017] In view of the fact that as per public prosecutor, the investigation, is now handed over to the CID CB, therefore, the present Investigating Officer is directed to remain present before this Court alongwith previous Investigating Officer as ordered vide order dated 28.11.2017.

However, the public prosecutor is directed to furnish the information to the Court what was the occasion for transferring this investigation to the CID CB.

The Interim order, if any, shall remain in currency till the next date of hearing.

List on 3.1.2018.

(GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), J.

Ishan(49)