Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Binay Kumar Diwana vs The Union Of India And 3 Ors on 7 September, 2022

Author: Michael Zothankhuma

Bench: Michael Zothankhuma

                                                             Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010160842022




                     THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                         Case No. : WP(C)/5105/2022



         BINAY KUMAR DIWANA
         S/O SRI SHREEKRISHNA CHAURASIA
         R/O TYPE-III
         QUARTER NO. 14
         NHPC COLONY
         GERUKAMUKH
         DIST-DHEMAJI
         PIN-787035
         ASSAM


          VERSUS

         THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS.
         REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY (POWER)
         SHRAM SHAKTI BHAWAN
         RAFI MARG
         NEW DELHI
         DELHI-110001

         2:NHPC LIMITED
         REPRESENTED BY THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR
         CORPORATE OFFICE
          SECTOR-33
          FARIDABAD
          HARAYANA-121003
          3:THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
          NHPC LIMITED
         CORPORATE OFFICE
          SECTOR-33
          FARIDABAD
          HARAYAN-121003
          4:THE GROUP GENERAL MANAGER (CIVIL)
                                                                               Page No.# 2/3

             NHPC LIMITED
             CORPORATE OFFICE
             SECTOR-33
             FARIDABAD
             HARAYANA-121003
             ------------
             Advocate for : MR. U K NAIR
             Advocate for : ASSTT.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS.



                                  BEFORE
                HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA

                                           ORDER

07.09.2022 Heard Mr. M.P. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Senapati, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 4. None appears for the respondent no.1.

2. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition to enable him to take part in the selection process, for sponsorship of 2 (two) Executives for the 8 th Batch of 15 months Full Time Residential Programme in PGDM (Executive) Programme of NTPC School of Business, Noida, in terms of Circular Nos. NH/HRDCO/PGDM/NSB/2022-23 dated 23.06.2022 and NH/HRDCO/PGDM/NSB/2022-23 dated 19.07.2022 issued by the respondent no.3.

3. This Court vide order dated 05.08.2022 had passed an interim order, directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to participate in the interview process for sponsorship of 2 (two) Executives for the 8 th Batch of 15 months Full Time Residential Programme in PGDM (Executive) Programme of NTPC School of Business, Noida.

Page No.# 3/3

4. It has been brought to notice of this Court that the petitioner has been allowed to participate in the interview. However, the petitioner was not selected.

Instead one Bijoy R. Nair and Naresh Bansal have been selected for the 8 th Batch of 15 months Full Time Residential Programme in PGDM (Executive) Programme of NTPC School of Business, Noida, in terms of the "NHPC Scheme of Facilities for Higher Studies", in pursuant to the selection process undertaken in respect of Circulars dated 23.06.2022 and 19.07.2022.

5. In view of the above, this Court finds that the present writ petition has become infructuous.

6. The writ petition is accordingly closed as infructuous. It is needless to add that the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the selection of the two persons mentioned above, if so advised.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant