Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr.K V Thomas vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India on 29 January, 2014

                   Central Information Commission
Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New 
                                Delhi­110066
                             website­cic.gov.in

                  Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2013/000386/MP
 
Appellant                                  :     Shri K V Thomas, 
Trivandrum 
Public Authority               :     LIC of India , Ernakulam

Date of Hearing                :     29 January 2014 
Date of Decision               :     29 January 2014
  
Facts:­ 

1. The   appellant   Shri   K.   V.   Thomas   has   submitted   RTI  application   dated   28   August   2012   before   the   Central   Public  Information   Officer   (CPIO),   Life   Insurance   Corporation   of  India, Ernakulam; seeking information in relation to status of  application   for   granting   of   disallowed   leave   to   Mrs.   Rani  Thomas, formerly Development officer, LIC Branch I, Alappuzha  through total of 10 points. 

2. Vide CPIO Order dated  25 September  2012, CPIO furnished  the   requisite   information   point­wise   to   the   appellant.   Not  satisfied   by   the   CPIO's   reply   on   point   nos.­06   to   10,   the  appellant  preferred   appeal to the First Appellate  Authority  dated 18 October 2012.  Vide FAA Order dated 19 November 2012,  the FAA furnished the requisite information to the appellant. 

3.     Being aggrieved and not satisfied by the above response  of the Public Authority, the Appellant preferred second appeal  before the Commission.

4. The   matter   was   heard   today   via   videoconferencing.   The  appellant   Shri   K.   V   Thomas   was   present   and   made   submissions  from Trivandrum. The respondent Shri Sreekesh  Nair, CPIO and  Ms.  Ponnamma   Abraham,   Manager   (PS/SSS/CRM)   were  also   present  at   the   hearing   and   made   submissions   from   Ernakulum.     The  appellant in his submission said that he is representing his  daughter   and   he   has   submitted   the   power   of   attorney   to   the  CPIO.  He   submitted  that his daughter,    Ms Rani Thomas, had  been refused leave for a certain period by the LIC and that he  had   sent   a   notarized   copy   of   Ms.   Thomas     passport   and  requested for grant of disallowed leave.   The appellant also  stated   that   he     had   not   received   any   letter   asking   for  passport and therefore had demanded a copy of the letter along  with the proof of service. He also requested that the copy of  the   complete   file   should   be   provided   to   him.     Further,   the  appellant sought the copy of the papers relating to refusal of  appellant's   daughter's   application   for   leave   for   the   period  4/6/2010­4/7/2010.

5.       The   CPIO   in   his   rebuttal   submitted   that   as   per   the  Divisional   Office   letter   dated   15/7/2011,   Branch   office   was  asked   to   obtain   the   Passport       of   appellant's   daughter.  Subsequently, Branch office sent the letter dated 18/7/2011 to  the   appellant's   daughter   (through   ordinary   post)   which   was  undelivered.   Again   vide   letter   dated   12/12/2011   Divisional  Office   sent   a   reminder   to   the   Branch   Office.   Finally,   on  15/12/2011,  letter   asking   the   appellant's   daughter   to   submit  her Passport  was handed  over to her in person  in the Branch  Office. Also as per the prevalent practice in the office, no  acknowledgement   is   taken   from   the   employee   on   serving   any  document   in   person   to   him/her   in   the   Branch   Office.   The  appellant had refused to acknowledge the receipt of any such  letter(s) whatsoever. 

Decision Notice

6.       In light of the submissions  above,  Commission directs  the CPIO to :

i) Provide a copy  of the papers relating to refusal of  appellant's   daughter's   application   for   leave   for   the  period 4/6/2010­4/7/2010 to the appellant free of cost.
ii)    The   CPIO   is   further   directed   to   provide   a  confirmation  to   the   Commission   with   a   copy   to   the  appellant  in writing specifying clearly that as per the  prevalent   practice   in   the   office,   no   acknowledgement   is  taken from the employee on serving any document in person  to him/her in the Branch Office.  
iii)   The   CPIO   is   also   directed   to   provide   an  inspection   of   the   files   containing   the   letters,   receipt  and     proof   of   dispatch   of   letters   relating   to   the  appellant's   daughter's   leave   application   case,     at   a  mutually   convenient   date   and   time.   However,   no   personal  information   relating   to   third   party   may   be   disclosed  during such inspection.

7. The action on all the above points to be taken within 21  days of the receipt of the order of the Commission. 

 (Manjula Prasher) Information Commissioner Autnenticated  true copy:

(T.K.Mohapatra) Dy. Secretary & Dy. Regostrar Tel.No.011­26105027 Copy to: 
1. Mr. K.V.Thomas,    Vettimoottil, 317, A.K.G.Nagar,    Peroorkada PO,    Trivandrum­695005    Kerala
2. The CPIO under RTI    LIC of India, Divisional Office, PB No.1133    MG Road,     Ernakulam­682011
3. First Appellate Authority under RTI    LIC of India, Divisional Office,    Jeevan Prakash, M.G.Road,    Ernakulam­682011