Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Patna High Court - Orders

Smt. Geeta Kumari vs Supriya Bharti @ Ranju Kumari on 8 September, 2015

Author: Shivaji Pandey

Bench: Shivaji Pandey

           Patna High Court MA No.165 of 2014 (5) dt.08-09-2015




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                         Miscellaneous Appeal No.165 of 2014
                       ======================================================
                       Smt. Geeta Kumari, D/o Ram Janam Singh, wife of Sri Sanjay Kr. Singh,
                       resident of Mohalla-Sandalpur Sanichara Ashthan, PS-Bahadurpur, PO-
                       Mahendru, Patna-800006, at present residing at B-201, Shivam Vasant
                       Nagri, Sector-5, Gokhivare Post Vasai Road (East), District-Thane,
                       Maharastra-401208.
                                                                             .... .... Appellant/s
                                                        Versus
                       Supriya Bharti @ Ranju Kumari resident of village + PO -Shamsher
                       Nagar, PS-Daudnager, District-Aurangabad, residing at Mohalla-
                       Sandalpur Sanichara Ashthan, PS-Bahadurpur, PO-Mahendru, Patna-
                       800006.
                                                                            .... .... Respondent/s
                       ======================================================
                       Appearance :
                       For the Appellant/s    :    Mr. Manoj Kumar
                       For the Respondent/s    :
                       ======================================================
                       CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY
                       ORAL ORDER

5       08-09-2015

The counsel for the appellant has fairly submitted that the suit has been decreed and the interim order has been merged with the final order which led to rendering this appeal as infructuous.

In such view of the statement, this appeal is dismissed as infructuous.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/-

U