Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Nilima Dutta vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 17 May, 2013

Author: Debasish Kargupta

Bench: Debasish Kargupta

                                                         1




 17.05.2013. 
    rc 
                                         W.P. No. 15125 (W) of 2013 
                                                Nilima Dutta 
                                                    Versus 
                                       The State of West Bengal & Ors. 
                                                           

                          
                                          Mrs. Debjani Sahu                        ...     For     the 
                                   Petitioner. 
                          

                          None  appears  on  behalf  of  the  State‐Respondents  when  the 

matter is called on. Let affidavit‐of‐service be kept on record. 

This  writ  application  is  filed  by  the  petitioner  for  payment  of  interest for delayed payment of gratuity. 

The  petitioner  retired  from  service  of  an  Assistant  Teacher  of  Raipur  Kashiara  M.S.D.S.  Balika  Vidyaniketan,  District‐Burdwan  with  effect  from  June  30,  2009  on  attaining  the  age  of  retirement  on  superannuation.  

The  gratuity  money  was  paid  to  the  petitioner  on  February  11,  2010. 

Having  heard the learned  Counsel  appearing for the  respective  parties as also after considering the facts and circumstances of this case,  I  find  that  after  retirement  of  the  petitioner  from  the  service  of  an  Assistant  Teacher  on  attaining  the  age  of  retirement  on  superannuation, there was delay in payment of gratuity money.   But,  there  was  delay  on  the  part  of  the  petitioner  also  to  claim  interest  on  principal  amount  by  way  of  filling  this  writ  application.    The  above  issue  has  already  been  decided  by  a  judgment  dated  April  29,  2013  delivered in the matter of Parbati Maiti vs. The State of West Bengal &  Ors. (In re: W.P. No.19675 (W) of 2012) and the relevant portions of the  above decision are set out below:

"In view of the discussions and observations made hereinabove, the Secretary to the Government of West Bengal, Education Department, is directed to conduct an enquiry with regard to delayed payment of gratuity to the petitioners taking into consideration the provisions of the 2 said Government Order and to arrive at a decision within six months from the date of communication of this order. In the event, it is found that there was lapse or negligence on the part of any Government Officer, President/Secretary of Managing Committee or the Headmaster of the Non- Government Educational Institution concerned, payment of interest at the rate of 9 per cent per annum for the period between due date of payment and actual date of payment shall be released in favour of the concerned petitioner concerned within four weeks from the date of the above decision.
Liberty is given to the State Government to realise the above interest from the erring Officer or the person concerned from his salary or by way of raising public demand by initiating appropriate proceeding within two months from the date of the decision of the secretary to the Government of West Bengal, Education Department for protection of public interest by recovery of money to be spend from public exchequer. The State Government will also be at liberty to initiate disciplinary proceeding against the erring Officer within two months from the date of above decision of the Secretary to the Government of West Bengal, Education Department in appropriate cases. These writ applications are disposed of accordingly. There will be, however, no order as costs.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this judgment, if applied for, be given to the parties, as expeditiously as possible, upon compliance with the necessary formalities in this regard."

In view of the above settled proposition, the Commissioner of School Education, Government of West Bengal, is directed to take steps in the manner prescribed in the judgment dated April 29, 2013 delivered in the matter of Parbati Maiti vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. (In re: W.P. No.19675 (W) of 2012) as recorded hereinabove.

It is made clear that the direction is given to the Commissioner of School Education, Government of West Bengal instead of Secretary to the Government of West Bengal, Education Department, considering his pre- occupation with other important assignments attached to his post and the number of cases involving same and identical issue.

3

This writ application is, thus, disposed of.   There will be, however, no order as to costs.   Urgent  photostat  certified  copy  of  this  order,  if  applied  for,  be  given to the parties upon usual undertakings.        

( Debasish Kar Gupta, J. )