Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

M/S Wwics Ltd. Through Its Director ... vs Ut Of Chandigarh on 11 January, 2016

Author: Kuldip Singh

Bench: Kuldip Singh

                                                            SANJIV KUMAR SHARMA
                                                            2016.01.12 10:44
                                                            I attest to the accuracy and
                                                            authenticity of this document
                                                                              122
        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                      AT CHANDIGARH
                             CRM No. M-752 of 2016 (O/M)
                             Date of decision : 11.1.2016

M/s WWICS Ltd.                                   ....... Petitioner
                                 Versus
State of U.T. Chandigarh                         ....... Respondent

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDIP SINGH

Present:- Mr. Gurbachan Singh Bhatia, Advocate,
          for the petitioner.
1.          Whether the Reporters of local newspaper may be allowed to
            see the judgment ?
2.          To be referred to the Reporter or not.
3.          Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest ?
            -.-                       -.-

KULDIP SINGH J. (ORAL)

Learned counsel for the petitioner-Company contends that he does not press this petition against the order dated 8.12.2015, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh, under Section 305 Cr.P.C. However, he contends that he intends to move an application before the lower Court for exemption of personal appearance of the accused and he has apprehension that if any such application is moved, the present order will stand in his way.

It being so, the present petition is dismissed with the observation that if an application before the lower Court for exemption of personal appearance of the accused is moved that will be independently decided without considering the effect of the impugned order dated 8.12.2015, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh, under Section 305 Cr.P.C.

(KULDIP SINGH) JUDGE 11.1.2016 sjks