Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0] [Entire Act]

State of Madhya Pradesh - Section

Section 441D in The M.P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1956

441D. Decision of election petition.

(1)At the conclusion of the trial of an election petition, the Court shall make an order-
(a)dismissing the election petition; or
(b)declaring the election or [nominations] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 16 of 1994.] of all or any of the returned candidates to be void; or
(c)declaring the election or [nominations] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 16 of 1994.] of all or any of the returned candidates to be void and the petitioner and any other candidate to have been duly elected or [nominations] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 16 of 1994.].
(2)It any person who tiled an election petition has, in addition to calling in question the election or [nominations] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 16 of 1994.] of the returned candidate, claimed declaration, that he himself or any other candidate has been duly elected or [nominations] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 16 of 1994.] and the Court is of opinion-
(a)that in fact the petition or such other candidate received a majority of the valid votes; or
(b)that but for the votes obtained by the returned candidate the petitioner or such other candidate would have obtained a majority of the valid votes,
the Court shall, after declaring the election or [nominations] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 16 of 1994.] of the returned candidate to be void, declare the petitioner or such other candidate, as the case may be, to have been duly elected or [nominations] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 16 of 1994.].
(3)At the lime of making an order under this section, the Court shall also make an order-
(a)where any charge is made in the petition of any corrupt practice having been committed at the election or [nominations] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 16 of 1994.], recording-
(i)a finding whether any corrupt practice has or has not been proved to have been committed at the election or [nominations] [Substituted by M.P. Act of 16 of 1994.], and the nature of that corrupt practice; and
(ii)the name of all persons, if any, who have been proved at the trial to have been guilty of any corrupt practice and the nature of that practice; and
(b)fixing the total amount of costs payable, and specifying the person by and to whom costs shall be paid :
Provided that a person who is not a party to the petition shall not be named in the order under sub-clause (ii) of clause (a) unless-
(a)he has been given notice to appear before the Court and show-cause why he should not be so named; and
(b)if he appears in pursuance of the notice, he has been given an opportunity of cross-examining any witness who has already been examined by the Court and has given evidence against him, of calling evidence in his defence and of being heard.