Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 6]

Bombay High Court

Datta Suryabhan Pawar And Another vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Deputy ... on 10 October, 2018

Author: Z.A. Haq

Bench: Z.A. Haq

                                                                                  1                                                                wp534.18

                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR


                                                        WRIT PETITION NO.534/2018

                                                   Datta Suryabhan Pawar and another
                                                                  ..Vs..
                                                     State of Maharashtra and others
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,                                                                                         Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
                                                    Shri M.P. Kariya, Advocate for the petitioners. 
                                                    Shri S.S. Doifode, A.P.P. for respondent No.1 / State. 
                                                    Shri R.R. Rathod, Advocate for respondent No.2.


                                                                CORAM :  Z.A. HAQ, J.

DATE : 10.10.2018.

After matter was heard for some time, it was found that map of the site, which is relevant and necessary for adjudication of the matter, is not placed on record. The learned Advocates for the parties submit that map of the site is part of the record of subordinate authorities. I am unable to understand the controversy in the absence of the map.

The learned Advocate for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh petition. The writ petition is disposed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

JUDGE Tambaskar.

::: Uploaded on - 15/10/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 16/10/2018 23:44:33 :::