Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court

Rama Nand Singh vs The State Of Bihar & Anr on 12 September, 2017

Author: Arun Kumar

Bench: Arun Kumar

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

                    Criminal Miscellaneous No.38282 of 2011
                Arising Out of PS.Case No. -0 Year- null Thana -null District- LAKHISARAI
===========================================================
Rama Nand Singh Late Nathuni Singh R/O,Vill.-Ekashi Tola,P.S.-Bariarpur,
District.-Munger At Present Posted As Principal, International College Ghosaith,
P.S.-Piri Bazar, District.-Lakhisarai

                                                                            .... ....   Petitioner
                                       Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Chandreshwar Prasad Singh Late Surendra Prasad Singh R/O,Vill.-Ghosaith,
   P.S.-Piri Bazar, District.-Lakhisarai

                                                      .... .... Opposite Parties
===========================================================
       Appearance :
       For the Petitioner/s        : Mr. Siya Ram Shahi, Advocate
       For the Opposite Party No. 2 : None
       For the State                : None
===========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 12-09-2017

                    Hear d l ear ned Counsel f or t he pet i t i oner . None

   appear s on behal f of t he St at e or t he Opposi t e par t y No.

   2.

                    2.    The pet i t i oner           is     t he Ex        Pr i nci pal     of

   I nt er nat i onal     Col l ege,       Ghosai t         in      t he      di st r i ct    of

   Lakhi sar ai . He seeks quashi ng of t he or der dat ed 27.1.2010

   passed by t he Judi ci al              Magi st r at e, l st        Cl ass, Lakhi sar ai

   i n Compl ai nt Cased No. 681(C) of 2009, wher eby cogni zance

   has been t aken under                Sect i on 420 of              t he I PC and has

   i ssued summons t o st and t he t r i al .
 Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38282 of 2011 dt.12-09-2017                                               2




                           3. The shor t f act of t he case as nar r at ed i n

        t he compl ai nt pet i t i on i s t hat t he pet i t i oner whi l e bei ng

        empl oyed       as    Adhi dar shak       in        t he     of f i ce    of    Assi st ant

        Di r ect or , I ndust r i es, Si nghbhum, Chai basa Of f i ce al so got

        hi msel f      empl oyed as        a Lect ur er            i n t he Col l ege si nce

        24.10.1978
, got            pr omot i on al so i n t he year                    1985 as a

        Pr i nci pal    and get t i ng sal ar y f r om bot h t he or gani zat i on.

        Fur t her ,      it     is      al l eged          t hat        he       has    commi t t ed

        i r r egul ar i t i es i n t he appoi nt ment               on t eachi ng and non-

t eachi ng post s by f avour i ng hi s own ki t h and ki n and al so i ndul ged i n f i nanci al i r r egul ar i t i es.

4. Lear ned Counsel appear i ng on behal f of t he pet i t i oner submi t s t hat t he compl ai nant i s ex-empl oyee of t he Col l ege who was r emoved f r om hi s post as he was not appoi nt ed on a sanct i oned post and a hi gh l evel enqui r y made enqui r y i n connect i on wi t h t he al l eged f i nanci al i r r egul ar i t i es and appoi nt ment pur suant t o di r ect i on gi ven i n CWJC No. 8286 of 2010 but t he Chancel l or of t he Uni ver si t y f ound t he appoi nt ment of f i ve t eacher s and sevent een non-t eachi ng st af f s as l egal and val i d and t he empl oyment of r est ot her st af f s was f ound not val i d. So such st af f s, whose appoi nt ment s wer e not f ound val i d, t he Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38282 of 2011 dt.12-09-2017 3 compl ai nant bei ng one of t hem, mal i ci ousl y l odged t he pr esent compl ai nt . Some ot her st af f s al so l odged si mi l ar nat ur e of compl ai nt i n anot her di st r i ct of Begusar ai but t hat case has been di smi ssed due t o non pr osecut i on. The f ur t her cont ent i on of t he l ear ned Counsel f or t he pet i t i oner i s t hat t hough t he pet i t i oner was appoi nt ed i n 1978 as Adhi dar shak i n t he I ndust r i es Depar t ment but he went on l eave and t hen j oi ned as a Lect ur er i n t he Col l ege but di d not get sal ar y. The pet i t i oner has now r et i r ed f r om t he post of Pr i nci pal of t he Col l ege.

5. Havi ng consi der ed t he submi ssi ons of t he l ear ned Counsel f or t he pet i t i oner and on per usal of t he r ecor ds, t he Cour t f i nds t hat t hi s i s an admi t t ed posi t i on t hat t he pet i t i oner was a gover nment ser vant bei ng appoi nt ed as Adhi dar shak i n t he depar t ment of I ndust r i es and post ed i n t he of f i ce of Assi st ant Di r ect or , I ndust r i es at Si nghbhum, Chai basa and was post ed t her e t i l l 31.6.1981 but si mul t aneousl y al so got appoi nt ed as a Lect ur er in t he I nt er nat i onal Col l ege and wor ki ng t her e si nce 24.10.1978. So bei ng a gover nment ser vant suppr essi ng t he f act of hi s ear l i er empl oyment i n t he gover nment ser vi ce he j oi ned as a Lect ur er al so i n t he I nt er nat i onal Col l ege Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38282 of 2011 dt.12-09-2017 4 whi ch i s cont r ar y t o t he Ser vi ce Rul es as wel l as Conduct Rul es of a gover nment empl oyee. Thi s par t of al l egat i on const i t ut es pr i ma f aci e case agai nst hi m under Sect i on 420 of t he I PC al so. As f ar as t he al l egat i on concer ni ng i r r egul ar i t i es i n t he appoi nt ment i n t he col l ege and f i nanci al i r r egul ar i t i es ar e concer ned, t hat mat t er was deci ded by t he Uni ver si t y and no subst ance was f ound i n t he enqui r y. But as f ar as bei ng empl oyed at t wo pl aces, bei ng a gover nment ser vant , suppr essi ng t he sai d f act get t i ng ot her empl oyment and get t i ng f i nanci al advant age by way of dr awi ng sal ar y f r om t wo pl aces cer t ai nl y makes out pr i ma f aci e case agai nst hi m. So I do not f i nd any gr ound f or i nt er f er ence wi t h t he i mpugned or der .

6. Thi s appl i cat i on i s accor di ngl y di smi ssed.

(Arun Kumar, J.) Snkumar/-



AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE          N/A
Uploading Date 14.09.2017
Transmission 14.09.2017
Date