Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Union Of India vs Prestress Wire Industries Now Known As ... on 7 December, 2020

Author: G.S. Patel

Bench: G.S. Patel

                                                                     32-ARBPL-6948-2020.DOCX




                   Shephali



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                              ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 6948 OF 2020



                    Union of India Through Deputy Chief Engineer                ...Petitioner
                    (Track Safety) Western Railway, Churchgate,
                    Mumbai
                          Versus
                    Prestress Wire Industries                                 ...Respondent

Mr TJ Pandian, with Mr TC Subramanian & Mr Nitin Kasbe, for the Petitioner.

                                             CORAM:          G.S. PATEL, J
                                                             (Through Video Conference)
                                             DATED:          7th December 2020
                    PC:-


1. Heard through video conferencing.

2. The Petition is under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 and challenges an Award dated 29th July 2020 by a sole Arbitrator.

Shephali Mormare Digitally signed

3. Mr Pandian for the Petitioner states that the Respondents have by Shephali Mormare Date: 2020.12.08 10:41:49 +0530 been served on Saturday i.e. 5th December 2020. The Respondent's Page 1 of 2 7th December 2020 32-ARBPL-6948-2020.DOCX principal office is in Gulbarga though they have a Mumbai office in the Fort area. Mr Pandian agrees that he will serve them again.

4. List the matter on 6th January 2021, in the morning session.

5. In the event that the Respondents seek to move in execution, liberty to Mr Pandian to apply for a stay including before the learned vacation Court.

6. This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary of this Court. All concerned will act on production of a digitally signed copy of this order.

(G. S. PATEL, J) Page 2 of 2 7th December 2020