Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Delhi District Court

Complainant vs Khwaja Afzal Nizami on 29 April, 2017

             IN THE COURT OF SHRI SANJIV JAIN, 
      ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE ­ SPECIAL. FAST TRACK 
             COURT : SAKET COURTS: NEW DELHI.

Unique Case ID No. 02406R0275282015
SC No.   :   143/15 and 2293/16
FIR No.  :  280/15
U/s.       :  376/328/420/506 IPC
PS       :  H N Din

State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
                                                              ................... Complainant
                 Versus

1.       Khwaja Afzal Nizami
         S/o Late Syed Afzal Nizami
         R/o H. No. 89, Ground Floor, 
         Basti Nizamuddin, Delhi.                   ....................Accused persons

Date of Institution          :                    09.12.2015
Judgment reserved for orders :                    29.04.2017
Date of pronouncement        :                    29.04.2017 

                                     JUDGMENT

Facts:

1.   The case of the prosecution is that the prosecutrix ( name  withheld   to  protect   her   identity)   was   a   divorcee.   She   was   aged  about 39 years. Her father lived in Mumbai. In July, 2010, she was  very upset since she lost her job. She went to Hazrat Nizamuddin  Shrine  to offer  prayer.  There  she  met the   accused Peer Khwaja  Afzal   Nizami.   He   took   her   in   his   office   and   asked   about   her  problem.   He   told   her   that   he   would   do   prayer   for   her   and   she  would have to come in his office daily in the evening for some  days. Since July, 2012 she started going to his office at 8.00 p.m  State v. Khwaja Afzal Nizami FIR No. 280/15 P.S H N Din Page No. 1 /12 daily. The accused used to give her tabeez dipped in a glass of  water   and   ask   her   to  drink  it   daily.   The   accused   used  to  chant  mantras on her head and make her sit in his office till late hours. 

Slowly   and   gradually,   by   taking   water,   she   lost   her  senses/memories.  On 31.07.2012 when she reached his  office at  about 8.00 p.m, the accused gave her water after dipping tabeez.  She started losing her senses. The accused told her that all her  problems would be solved if she marries him. Since she was not in  complete   sense,   she   gave   her   consent   for   the   marriage.   The  accused called 3­4 persons already sitting there to perform their  false marriage ceremony. Her signatures and thumb impressions  were obtained on some papers and a false marriage certificate was  prepared. The accused also took her photographs in objectionable  position. He took her to her house in an auto and expressed his  desire to sleep in her house at Munirka but she refused.  

2.   It   is   further   the   case   of   the   prosecution   that   between  01.08.2012   to   09.08.2012,   the   prosecutrix   repeatedly   asked   the  accused to give her the marriage certificate or its photocopy but  the accused avoided and told her that her marriage with him is  legal and genuine. On 09.08.2012, the accused after making her  believe   that   she   is   his   legally   wedded   wife   committed   sexual  intercourse with her forcibly in her house at Munirka after giving  water making her unconscious and physically weak. Next morning,  when he left her house, he gave her Rs.2.0 Lacs to purchase a car.  He repeatedly raped her in her house at odd hours and whenever  she   told   the   accused   that   she   would   lodge   complaint   with   the  police, he deposited money in her account and met other expenses. 

State v. Khwaja Afzal Nizami FIR No. 280/15 P.S H N Din Page No. 2 /12 He thereafter asked her to shift in a house at Jangpura which he  arranged on rent. Although she refused but he threatened her to  defame. In June, 2013, the accused gave her water and shifted her  in  Jangpura   Extension.   He   started   coming   there.   Whenever  she  asked him to leave, he created scene in front of her neighbours  giving threats that he would commit suicide and after his death,  police would arrest her. 

3.   It   is   further   the   case   of   the   prosecution   that   the   accused  stopped paying her. She was put on road. On 29.11.2014, the family  members of the accused came to know of their marriage. Azmal,  son   of   the   accused   Khwaja,   removed   the   original   Marriage  Certificate from the almirah and destroyed it. On the same day at  11.40 p.m, he sent her a threatening message. According to the  prosecutrix, she never changed her name nor adopted Islam. She is  Christine   by   birth   and   still   Christine.   The   accused   Afzal  committed   rape   upon   her   under   the   influence   of   jadu­tona   and  tabeez after making her believe that her marriage is a valid legal  marriage  although she  was  not lawfully  married  to the  accused  since the accused has his wife and children living. He cheated her  by entering the mehar amount as Rs.5,000/­ instead of Rs.50.0 lacs  as was stated. 

Investigation

4.   The case was registered on the directions of the Court on  the complaint of the prosecutrix u/s 156(3) CrPC on 17.04.2015.  The   prosecutrix   was   got   medically   examined   at   AIIMS   on  07.05.2015. Her statement u/s 164 CrPC was got recorded wherein  she reiterated the allegations made in the complaint. She alleged  State v. Khwaja Afzal Nizami FIR No. 280/15 P.S H N Din Page No. 3 /12 that the accused also sent her threatening messages. The accused  was got medically examined. He was found capable of performing  sexual intercourse under normal circumstances. Statement of Qazi  who   had   allegedly   performed   their   marriage   was   recorded.   He  verified   the   Nikahnama.   The   witnesses   to   the   marriage   namely  Izrahul   Haq     and   Mohd.   Gaus   were   examined.   Investigation  revealed that the Superintendent Radha Charan in August, 2012  had   attested   the   affidavit   of   the   prosecutrix.   He   told   the  investigating   officer   that   his   staff/advocate   had   presented   the  documents   and   he   attested   them   due   to   heavy   work   load.   The  record   of   the   SDM   office   was   verified   but   no   such   entry   was  found.   After   the   investigation,  accused   persons   Khwaja   Afzal  Nizami   and   Sayed   Azmal   Nizami   were   sent   for   trial   for   the  offences punishable u/s 328/376/506 IPC.

5.   After complying with the requirements contemplated under  section 207 CrPC, the case was committed to this Court. Charge

6.   Vide detailed order dated 22.04.2017, prima facie case was  made   out   against   the   accused   Khwaja   Afzal   Nizami   for   the  offences   punishable   u/s   328/376/420/506   IPC.   Accused   Sayed  Azmal  Nizami  was   discharged of  the   offences.   The  charge   was  framed against the accused Khwaja Afzal Nizami. He pleaded not  guilty and claimed trial.

Prosecution Evidence

7.   To substantiate its allegations against the accused Khwaja  Afzal   Nizami,   the   prosecution   examined   as   many   as   four  witnesses. 

State v. Khwaja Afzal Nizami FIR No. 280/15 P.S H N Din Page No. 4 /12 PW1/prosecutrix  testified on oath that her first  marriage   took   place   in   1996.   She   took   divorce  from   her   husband   in   2003.   Her   father   lives   in  Mumbai.   Her   mother   lives   with   her   brother   in  Delhi at Munirka, Delhi. She used to live with her  mother   at   Munirka.   In   July   2012,   she   went   to  Hazrat   Nizamuddin   Dargah   where   she   met   the  accused Khwaja Afzal Nizami. She was in need of  a job. The accused told her that he would pray for  her job. She started going there. She used to go  there in the afternoon. He used to do prayer for  her.   He   thereafter   asked   her   to   marry   him.   She  then did nikah with him in 2012 with her consent  vide Nikahnama Ex.PW1/A bearing her signature  and photograph. The accused also signed on the  Nikahnama. She stated that before doing Nikah,  she changed her religion from Christian to Islam  and also changed her name. In that respect, she  executed an affidavit Ex.PW1/B. She stated that  she and the accused started living together. First  of all, they lived in the flat at Munirka i.e. in the  flat of her mother for six months. He thereafter  shifted   her   in   the   house   at   Jungpura   i.e.   2/35,  double   storey,   Jungpura   Extn.,   New   Delhi.   She  stated   that   during   their   stay   at   Munirka   and  Jungpura   Extn.,   they   had   physical   relations   and  their relations were consensual. She stated that the  State v. Khwaja Afzal Nizami FIR No. 280/15 P.S H N Din Page No. 5 /12 accused thereafter stopped coming to her and said  that he does not consider their marriage as a valid  marriage. He also stopped bearing her expenses.  She contacted his son Sayed Ajmal in this regard  but   he   refused   to   intervene   in   their   matter.   In  anger, on 13.12.2014, she made the complaint Ex.  PW1/C after taking legal advise. She stated that  on 07.05.2015, she was taken to AIIMS where she  was   medically   examined   vide   MLC   Ex.PW1/D.  She   stated   that   the   doctor   did   not   ask   anything  from   her.   On   08.05.2015,   she   was   taken   to   the  Court   where   her   statement   Ex.   PW1/E   was  recorded. She stated that since at that time, she did  not   find   any   change   in   the   behaviour   of   the  accused, she made the statement on the lines of  her complaint Ex.PW1/C. She stated that she was  also under depression and anger since the accused  was not living with her nor was bearing her daily  needs. She stated that now, their dispute has been  resolved.   A   compromise   Ex.   PW1/F   has   been  entered into and the accused has given talaq to her  by   oral   pronouncement   in   the   presence   of   two  witnesses. He also paid her mehar and alimony.  She stated that it was also agreed that the accused  would   withdraw   his   case   pending   before   the  Family   Court   regarding   restitution   of   conjugal  rights.   She   stated   that   now,   she   has   no   relation  State v. Khwaja Afzal Nizami FIR No. 280/15 P.S H N Din Page No. 6 /12 with the accused. 

   She was declared hostile by the prosecution but  nothing favouring the prosecution came from her  mouth.   She   denied   that   during   her   visits   to   his  office,   he   gave   her  Tabeez   dipped   in  water   and  the accused used to give water to drink. She also  denied that slowly, she started losing her memory  and the accused used to make her sit in his office  for late hours and whenever she wanted to leave  his office, he did not allow her to go home. She  denied that on 31.07.2012, the accused made her  drink  water   mixed  with  tabeez   and  she   lost  her  consciousness   and     agreed  to    marry   with   him.  She denied that the accused used to force her to  take   water   mixed   with   tabeez   to   make   her  unconscious   and   thereafter   he   used   to   commit  rape   upon   her.   She   denied   that   she   wanted   to  report   the   matter   to   the   police   but   the   accused  threatened her to defame and kill. She denied that  the accused used to visit her at Jungpura at mid  night and rape her, saying that she is his wife and  he has every right to have sexual intercourse with  her.   She   denied   that   the   accused     performed   a  false   marriage   with   her.   She   denied   that   her  complaint Ex.PW1/C  and statement Ex. PW 1/E  were voluntary.

PW2   Iftekhar   Alam  was   the     Qazi   at  State v. Khwaja Afzal Nizami FIR No. 280/15 P.S H N Din Page No. 7 /12 Nizamuddin Dargah. He stated that on 01.08.2012,  accused Khwaja Afzal Nizami, came to him with  the   prosecutrix.     She   told   him   that   she   has  converted   her   religion   from   Christian   to   Islam.  She gave him affidavit Ex.PW1/B. She also gave  him her consent for her  nikah  with the accused.  He   stated   that   he   performed   the  nikah  of   the  accused with the prosecutrix as per Muslim rites  and customs. The mehar was fixed as Rs. 5,000/­.  A  Nikahnama Ex.PW1/A was executed. Both the  of them signed on the Nikahnama in the presence  of   the   witnesses.     He   stated   that   he   had  ascertained the voluntariness of the accused and  the prosecutrix before performing nikah.   PW3   Izharul   Haq  was   the   witness   to   their  Nikahnama  EXPW1/A. He deposed on the lines  of PW2. He stated that both the prosecutrix and  the   accused   were   looking   normal   when   they  signed the Nikahnama.

PW4 Inspector Sushma on receipt of complaint,  Ex.PW1/C,     prepared   the   rukka   Ex.PW4/A   and  got the FIR Ex.PW4/B registered. On 07.05.2015,  she got the prosecutrix medically examined vide  MLC   Ex.PW1/D.   On   08.05.2015,   she   got   her  statementEx.PW1/E recorded from the Magistrate.  She   thereafter   handed   over   investigation   to   SI  Satender Gulia.

State v. Khwaja Afzal Nizami FIR No. 280/15 P.S H N Din Page No. 8 /12

8.   The essence of  rape is the absence of consent. The consent  means an intelligent and positive concurrence of the woman. A  woman is said to consent, only when she freely agrees to submit  herself, while in free and unconstrained possession of her physical  or moral power to act in a manner she wanted. Submissions under  the influence of fear or terror or false promise is not consent.

9.   Perusal  of  the  testimony of  PW1/prosecutrix would  show  that   she   had   already   divorced   her   husband   when   she   came   in  contact with the accused. She used to live with her family in a flat  at Munirka. She was in need of a job. In July, 2012, she went to  Hazrat Nizamuddin Dargah and met the accused. She discussed  her problem with the accused who told her that he would do prayer  for   her.   She   started   going   there   almost   daily.   The   accused  thereafter proposed her for marriage which she agreed. They did  their nikah in the same year. Before doing nikah, she changed her  religion from Christian to Islam and in that respect, she executed  an affidavit Ex. PW 1/B. PW2 was the Qazi who performed their  nikah. He has stated that on 01.08.2012, the accused came with the  prosecutrix. After ascertaining their voluntariness, he performed  their nikah as per Muslim Rites and Customs. He stated that both  prosecutrix and the accused signed on the Nikahnama Ex. PW 1/A  which   also   bears   their   photographs.   He   stated   that   mehar   of  Rs.5,000/­ was fixed and it was entered in the Nikahnama. PW3  had witnessed their nikah. He stated that both the prosecutrix and  the  accused were normal when they signed the Nikahnama Ex.  PW1/A. State v. Khwaja Afzal Nizami FIR No. 280/15 P.S H N Din Page No. 9 /12

10.   Testimony of PW1/prosecutrix shows that after doing nikah,  they lived together in the flat at Munirka and Jungpura Extension.  During their stay, they made physical relations. She has stated that  their   physical   relations   were   consensual.   She   has   categorically  denied that the accused gave her tabeez dipped in the water, as a  result, she lost her memory and consciousness and agreed to marry  with the accused. She also denied that the accused forced her to  drink   water   in   which   tabeez   was   dipped.   She   stated   that   her  marriage with the accused was voluntary and the accused never  forced upon her. 

11.   Testimony of PW1/prosecutrix further shows that when the  accused stopped coming to her, bearing her expenses and he told  her that he does not consider their marriage as a valid marriage,  she contacted his son Sayed Azmal but he refused to intervene in  their matter. This enraged her. She thereafter took legal advice and  made the complaint Ex. PW1/C. She denied that she narrated the  history   of   incident   to   the   doctor.   She   stated   that   she   gave   the  statement Ex. PW1/E in anger  since she did not find change in the  behaviour of the accused who had refused to keep her and bear her  expenses. She then referred the compromise Ex. PW 1/F entered  between them. She stated that now the accused has divorced her  and he has also undertaken to withdraw the case filed by him for  restitution   of   conjugal   rights.   She   stated   that   now   she   has   no  relation with the accused.

12.   The testimony of the prosecutrix is very categorical to the  facts that accused never intoxicated her nor forced her to change  her   religion   from   Christian   to   Islam   nor   induced/forced   her   to  State v. Khwaja Afzal Nizami FIR No. 280/15 P.S H N Din Page No. 10 /12 marry him, rather she had willingly married to the accused. As  regards  her mehar amount,  PW2  has  stated that Rs.5,000/­ was  fixed as mehar amount and it was entered in the Nikahnama Ex.  PW 1/A. The prosecutrix did not give any evidence that Rs.50.0  lacs was fixed as mehar when she signed on the Nikahnama Ex.  PW 1/A.   There is no evidence to show that the accused cheated  and dishonestly induced the prosecutrix to marry him or that he  entered the mehar amount as Rs.5,000/­ as against Rs. 50.0 lacs in  the   Nikahnama   Ex.   PW   1/A.   PW3   has   stated   that   when   the  prosecutrix and the accused signed on the Nikahnama, they were  looking   normal.   PW2   has   stated   that   he   had   ascertained   the  voluntariness   of   both   of   them   before   performing   their   nikah.  Testimony of PW1 shows that the accused never forced upon her  and whenever they made physical relations, they were consensual.  There   is   no   evidence   to   show   that   the   accused   at   any   time  criminally   intimidated   the   prosecutrix/PW1   or   created   scene   in  front of her neighbours that he would commit suicide or after his  death, the police would arrest her or that on 29.04.2014, he sent  her a threatening message.  

13. Looking   into   the   testimony   of   the   prosecutrix   and   other  witnesses   who   did   not   say   anything   incriminating   against   the  accused,   I   did   not   find   any   purpose   to   examine   the   remaining  prosecution witnesses as their testimony even if unrebutted would  not become the basis of the conviction of the accused.  Prosecution  Evidence was accordingly closed. Since no incriminating evidence  came on record against the accused, his statement u/s 313 CrPC  was dispensed with.

State v. Khwaja Afzal Nizami FIR No. 280/15 P.S H N Din Page No. 11 /12 Conclusion  

14.   In   the   light   of   above   discussions,   I   am   of   the   view   that  necessary   ingredients   of   the   offences  punishable   u/s  328/376/420/506   with   which   the   accused   was   charged   are   not  proved against him.  I therefore acquit the accused of the offences  punishable u/s 328/376/420/506 IPC. His bail bond be cancelled.  His surety be discharged. He is, however, directed to furnish bail  bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/­ with one surety of the like amount  in compliance of Section 437A CrPC.

15.   File be consigned to the Record Room. 

Announced in the open court        ( Sanjiv Jain) on 29.04.2017.   ASJ­Spl.FTC/ Saket Courts       New Delhi. 

  

State v. Khwaja Afzal Nizami FIR No. 280/15 P.S H N Din Page No. 12 /12