Madhya Pradesh High Court
The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Matwar Singh on 2 November, 2015
COMMON CONDITIONAL ORDER IN THE MATTERS RELATING TO SERIAL
NOS.1001 TO 1044
02/11/2015
The Court proposes to pass this common conditional order to obviate passing of
identical conditional order in these matters involving similar office
objection/default :
In all these matters, due to non-removal of office objection within the prescribed time
as per the Rules, the concerned matter was placed before the Registrar in the first
instance. The Registrar granted sufficient time to the petitioner(s)
applicant(s)/appellant(s) to cure the defect/office objection, however, due to non-
removal of office objection/default within the prescribed time, the concerned matter
was required to be once again listed before the Court. The Court granted further
time, by passing common order on the earlier occasion.
In spite of repeated opportunity ( three times â one under Rules, second by the
Registrar and third by Court), the petitioner(s), applicant(s)/appellant(s) has failed to
cure the office objection/default. As a result, by way of indulgence and last
opportunity, in terms of this order, 'SIX WEEKS' further time is granted to the
petitioner(s), applicant(s)/appellant(s) in the respective matters to remove office
objection/default and make the matter ready for further hearing within that time,
failing which the concerned petition/application/appeal shall stand dismissed for non-
prosecution without further reference to the Court.
Provided, however, in cases, where the objection/default is about non-service of
any of the respondent, on expiry of the extended period, the concerned matter will
stand dismissed for non-prosecution only against the unserved respondent (s), without further reference to the Court. The matter would then proceed against the remaining respondent (s).
In cases where the office objection/default has already been cured before passing of this order, it will be open to the concerned party to bring that fact to the notice of the Registrar (Judicial-II), who may examine the same and proceed with the matter as per the listing scheme, if ready for hearing.
If the office objections are removed within the time extended in terms of this order, the concerned matter(s) be made returnable on the date notified hereafter.
Cases No. Returnable Date
CONT 657/2006, FA 183/2008,
MA 1287/2008, CONC 414/2009,
MA 877/2009, MA 1574/2009,
MA 1629/2009, MA 1647/2009,
MA 1655/2009, MA 451/2010,
15/02/2015
MA 1381/2010, MA 1508/2010,
MA 309/2011, MA 1271/2011,
MA 1325/2011, MA 1509/2011,
FA 275/2012, MA 1104/2012,
MA 1144/2012 & MA 28/2013
MA 272/2013, FA 69/2014,
CR 110/2014, MA 1214/2014,
WP 4895/2014, MA 64/2015,
MCC 420/2015, Conc 573/2015,
Conc 574/2015, MA 891/2015,
16/12/2015
MA 892/2015, MA 893/2015,
MA 898/2015, MA 900/2015,
MA 901/2015, MA 913/2015,
MA 914/2015, MA 921/2015,
MA 922/2015 & WP 5803/2015
WP 5861/2015, WP 5914/2015,
17/12/2015
WP 5915/2015 & WP 5916/2015
(U.C.Maheshwari) Judge
Prachi*