Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Kanhaiya Lal Son Of Govindram vs Anchhi Devi Wif Of Hanmanram on 8 December, 2022

Author: Sudesh Bansal

Bench: Sudesh Bansal

                                              HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                                                          BENCH AT JAIPUR

                                                       S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 738/2022
                                    Kanhaiya Lal Son Of Govindram,
                                                                                                            ----Appellant
                                                                           Versus
                                    Anchhi Devi Wif Of Hanmanram
                                                                                                      ----Respondent


                                   For Appellant(s)             :    Mr. Mahendra Singh Gurjar
                                   For Respondent(s)            :    Mr. Sarthak Rastogi for respondent

Nos.1 to 3 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 08/12/2022 Appellants-plaintiffs have preferred this first appeal, feeling aggrieved by dismissal of their civil suit for declaration, possession, mesne profits and permanent injunction vide impugned judgment dated 12.7.2022 passed in suit No.29/2019 by the Additional District Judge, Dantaramgarh, District Sikar.

Heard.

Admit.

Issue notice.

Counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondents- defendants No.1 to 3 as Caveator. Notices be issued only to respondent No.4.

Counsel for respondent seeks time to file reply to the stay application.

Record of the trial Court be summoned. It is not in dispute that property in question is in possession of respondents and some part of the property has already been sold to respondent-defendant No.4 through registered sale deed.

Therefore, in the meanwhile, respondents are restrained from further sale the property in question.

(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /9 (Downloaded on 15/12/2022 at 12:04:03 AM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)