Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Kalpana Chakraborty vs Akshat Commercial P.Ltd. on 7 December, 2021

Bench: M.R. Shah, Sanjiv Khanna

     ITEM NO.2                              COURT NO.13                 SECTION XVI
                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
                                   Civil Appeal    No(s).   2524-2526/2016

     KALPANA CHAKRABORTY & ORS.                                          Appellant(s)

                                                     VERSUS

     AKSHAT                 COMMERCIAL P.LTD. & ORS.                     Respondent(s)

     ([IA-89992/21 IN CA-2524-26/16 MENTIONED]
      IA No. 89992/2021 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS)

     Date : 07-12-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
                             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

     For Appellant(s)                  Mr.   Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv.
                                       Mr.   Ritin Rai, Sr. Adv.
                                       Mr.   Snehal Kakrania, Adv.
                                       Mr.   Sanjeev Kapoor, Adv.
                                       For   M/s. Khaitan & Co., AOR

     For Respondent(s)                 Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, AOR

                                       Mr. Ashok Kumar Jain, Adv.
                                       Mr. Pankaj Jain, Adv.
                                       Mr. Bijoy Kumar Jain, AOR

                              UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

Application for substitution is allowed.

We have heard Mr. Amit Sibal, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the auction purchaser as well as Mr. Ashok Kumar Jain, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank at length.

Considering the earlier order dated 30.09.2016, the Registry is directed to notify the Special Leave Petition (C) No. 33645/2013 along with the present appeals on 09.12.2021.

So as to enable the appellants and the auction purchaser to settle the dispute amicably and so as to enable the appellants to Signature Not Verified consider the offer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of Digitally signed by R Natarajan Date: 2021.12.07 17:13:07 IST the auction purchaser, put up on 09.12.2021 on top of the Board. Reason:

     (R. NATARAJAN)                                                    (NISHA TRIPATHI)
     ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS                                             BRANCH OFFICER