Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Vivek Mahna vs Ministry Of Human Resource Development on 18 January, 2012

                  Central Information Commission
Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New 
                                Delhi­110066
           Telefax:011­26180532 & 011­26107254 website­cic.gov.in

                  Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2011/000965 

 Appellant /Complainant       :     Shri Vivek Mahna,New Delhi    
Public Authority              :     Indian Institute of Technology, 
Delhi 
                              ( Shri Vivek Raman, Asstt.Registrar)

Date of Hearing               :       18 January 2012 
Date of Decision              :       18 January 2012

Facts:­
 

1. Appellant submitted RTI application dated 22 October 2010  before the CPIO, IIT, New Delhi seeking 

1. Copy of the Study on sound barrier for IGI Airport   conducted in 2010 as requested by DIAL.(Delhi   International Airport Pvt. Ltd.)

2. Copy of Correspondence between DIAL and IIT, Delhi   regarding sound barrier for IGI Airport.

3. Copy of report from DNV or other independent   consultant regarding the Sound barrier for IGI Airport. 

2. Vide CPIO Order dated 24 November 2010, CPIO informed the  Appellant   that   information   is   barred   from   disclosure   under  section 8 (1) (d) of the RTI Act, 2005.

3. Not satisfied with the CPIO's reply, Appellant preferred  appeal before the First Appellate Authority.

4. Vide FAA Order dated 30 December 2010, the FAA informed  the Appellant that DIAL is not a public authority as envisaged  under   the   RTI   Act,   2005   and   hence   not   amenable   to   the  provisions of the RTI Act.

Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2011/000965 

5. Being   aggrieved   and   not   being   satisfied   by   the   above  response   of   the   public   authority,   the   appellant   preferred  second appeal before the Commission.

6. Matter was heard today. Both the parties were present at  the hearing in person. The "third party"­ DIAL was not present  at the hearing.

7. The   Respondent   submitted   that   they   have   informed   third  party   about   the   RTI   Application   but   the   third   party   has  refused   to   disclose   the   information   as   it   pertains   to   their  "trade   secret"   and   "commercial   confidence".   The   third   party  has further added that they are not 'public authority' as per  the   provisions   of   the   RTI   Act,   2005.   Respondent   has   stated  that   they   were   commissioned   by   the   third   party   to   undertake  the     study   on   sound   barrier   for   IGI   Airport   and   are   in  possession of a copy of the report. 

8. The   Appellant   submitted   that   the   disclosure   of  information is important as there is a Larger Public Interest  involved.   The   Appellant  further  submitted   that   the   community  living   around   the   Airport   are   facing   Noise   pollution   and  thereby affecting the health of the citizens.

9. The   Commission   is   further   informed   that   the   DIAL   has  approached   the   Supreme   Court   against   the   Decision   of   the  Commission   declaring   it   as   'public   authority',   and   thus   the  matter is sub­judice.

Decision notice

 10. The Commission takes note of the fact that the matter of  whether   DIAL   is   a   'public   authority'   is   before   Delhi   High  Court.   As   per   the   facts   before   Commission,   DIAL   is   to   be  treated as 'third party' in the present case as under section  23   (n)   of   the   RTI   Act,   2005   'third   party'     means   a   person  Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2011/000965  other   than   the   citizen   making   a   request   for   information   and  includes a public authority. 

11. Thus   Commission   would   like   to   hear   the   'third   party'  submissions   on   the   issue,   as   it   involves   larger   public  interest.  The Commission in the procedure of deciding appeal  under section 5 of the Central Information Commission (Appeal  Procedural) Rules, 2005 issues notice to the third party i.e.,  DIAL   to   attend   hearing   on   a   date   that   will   be   communicated  shortly to all the concerned parties. 

(Smt. Deepak Sandhu) Information Commissioner (DS) Authenticated true copy:

(T. K. Mohapatra) Dy. Secretary & Dy. Registrar Tel. No. 011­26105027 Copy to:­
1. Shri VivekMahna President Pushpanjali R.W.A.,  A­8, Pushpanjali Farms Bijwasan,   New Delhi­110061
2. The CPIO Dy. Registrar Indian Institute of Technology Delhi  Hauz Khas,  New Delhi­110016
3. The Appellate Authority Registrar Indian Institute of Technology Delhi  Hauz Khas, New Delhi­110016
4. The General Manager  Delhi International Airport (Pvt.) Ltd.,  New Udaan Bghawan, Terminal 3, Opp. ATS Complex International Terminal,  IGI,  Airport New Delhi­110037   Appeal: No. CIC/DS/A/2011/000965