Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 60]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Vidarbha Irrigation Development ... vs Santosh Janba Warghane on 27 January, 2017

Bench: Arun Mishra, Amitava Roy

  ITEM NO.25 + 55                             COURT NO.9               SECTION IX

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F     I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

  Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.2185-2186/2017
  (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated
  26/10/2016 in FAST No. 19139/2015 27/10/2016 in FAST No.
  19139/2015 26/10/2016 in CAF No. 672/2016 27/10/2016 in CAF
  No. 672/2016 passed by the High Court Of Bombay At Nagpur)

  VIDARBHA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION                         Petitioner(s)

                                                  VERSUS

  SANTOSH JANBA WARGHANE AND ANR                    Respondent(s)

(with appln. (s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interim relief) with SLP(C) Nos.2859-2860/2017 (With application for deletion of the name of respondent and exemption from filingc/c of the impugned judgment and exemption from filing OT and interim relief and office report) with SLP(C) 2861/2017 (With appln. For exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and interm relief and office report) Date : 27/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Manish Pitale, Adv.
Mr. J.B. Kasat, Adv.
Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri,Adv.

  For Respondent(s)
Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by       UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
HEMALATHA MOHAN
Date: 2017.02.04
11:46:28 IST                                 O R D E R
Reason:



Issue notice returnable in six weeks. Dasti in addition.
-2-
It is submitted by learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants that the amount of compensation has been deposited before the High Court. Let 50% of the amount be disbursed to the claimants. With respect to the remaining 50% there shall be stay till the next date of hearing.
In the meantime there shall be stay of the impugned judgment and it will be not followed in other cases.
SLP(C) Nos.2859-2860/2017 Application for deleting the name of Respondent No.7 from the array of parties is allowed. Amendment to be carried out within period of seven days.




(HEMALATHA MOHAN)                    (TAPAN KR. CHAKRABORTY)
     SR.P.A.                               COURT MASTER