Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Mr. Sridhar, No.3, K Block, 56 Krishna ... vs M/S. Ozone Projects Pvt. Ltd., Rep By Its ... on 30 August, 2023

Daily Order IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI - 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon'ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT                       C.C. No.04/2021 DATED THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 Mr. Sridhar, S/o. Shri. A.V. Dharmapadham, No.3, "K" Block, 56-Krishna Apartments, Anna Nagar East, Chennai - 600 102.                                                                                  .. Complainant.                                                   

- Versus -

M/s. Ozone Projects Private Limited, Represented by its Chairman, G.N. Chetty Road, T. Nagar, Chennai - 600 017.                                                                             .. Opposite party.

 

Counsel for the complainant                  : M/s. W. Sathasivam Counsel for the opposite party              : M/s. Tatva Legal Chennai   This consumer complaint coming up before this Commission on 30.08.2023 for appearance of both parties, for filing written argument of the opposite party and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court: 

                                                     Docket Order   No representation for both parties.
Today, this matter is posted for appearance of both parties, for filing written arguments of the opposite party and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal.  
When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., there was no representation for the complainant.  Hence, the matter was passed over and again called at 12.00 Noon, still, there was no representation for the complainant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the consumer complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case.
Hence, this consumer complaint is dismissed for default.   No costs.
   
                                                                                                              Sd/-                                                                        
                                                                        R.SUBBIAH                                                                                                                                       PRESIDENT