Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Rajbir Singh vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 18 January, 2016

Author: Ritu Bahri

Bench: Ritu Bahri

                     CWP No.9263 of 2015                                                1

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                     AT CHANDIGARH


                                                   CWP No.9263 of 2015
                                                   Date of decision: 18.01.2016


                     Rajbir Singh
                                                                            ....Petitioner

                                                   Versus
                     State of Haryana and others
                                                                        ....Respondents
                     CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
                     Present:   Mr. Pankaj Midha, Advocate
                                for the petitioner.

                                Mr. Keshav Gupta, AAG, Haryana.

                     RITU BAHRI J. (Oral)

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the respondents to pay retiral benefits i.e. Death-cum- Retirement Gratuity, Earned Leave, Leave Encashment Benefit, Commuted Pension and TDS along with interest.

The petitioner joined the respondent-department on 17.09.1983 and his services were regularized on 30.09.1988. At the time of retirement, the petitioner was serving as SS Master at Government Senior Secondary School, Turkiawas, Rewari and after attaining the age of superannuation, he was retired on 30.04.2013.

Upon notice in the present petition, written statement MOHD YAKUB 2016.01.23 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CWP No.9263 of 2015 2 dated 05.01.2016, on behalf of respondents No.1 to 5 has been filed stating therein that the petitioner was charge-sheeted under Rule 7 of the Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1987 vide order dated 11.03.2013. The petitioner gave the reply of the charge-sheet, but the punishing authority was not satisfied with the said reply and they had appointed an Enquiry Officer to enquire the allegations imposed upon the petitioner. The Enquiry Officer conducted the enquiry and submitted the enquiry report on 28.01.2014. Thereafter, the punishing authority vide order dated 25.06.2014 ordered that the charge-sheet served to the petitioner be cancelled. The following retiral benefits have alreay been granted to the petitioner:-

                      Sr.       HEAD                         AMOUNT (in Rs.)   DATED
                      No.
                      1         General Provident Fund       729338            21.07.2013
                      2         Group Insurance Scheme       15922             21.10.2014
                      3         Leave Encashment (58 days)   91732             01.10.2014
                      4         Commutation of Pension       529584            21.08.2015
                      5         Extra-ordinary   Leave   (180 284668           20.09.2015
                                days)
                      6         Death-cum-Retirement         664275            21.08.2015
                                Gratuity



A perusal of the above table shows that after cancellation of the charge-sheet on 25.06.2014, commutation of pension has been paid on 21.08.2015, extra-ordinary leave (180 days) has been paid on 20.09.2015 and Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity has been paid on 21.08.2015. All the aforesaid payments should have been made within three months after dropping the MOHD YAKUB 2016.01.23 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CWP No.9263 of 2015 3 charges against the petitioner which has not been done.

Keeping in view the above facts and circumstances and in view of the judgment "Megh Varan Sharma vs State of U.P. and others", 2015(1) SCT 12, the present petition, at this stage, is disposed of with a direction to respondents to pay the interest @ 9% w.e.f. 01.10.2014 till the date of payment to the petitioner.

(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE 18.01.2016 yakub MOHD YAKUB 2016.01.23 11:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh