Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Aman Khera & Etc. Etc. vs Commissioner Of Income Tax - Ix, & Etc. ... on 4 January, 2017

Bench: A.K. Sikri, R.K. Agrawal

     ITEM NO.25                                   COURT NO.8                     SECTION IIIA

                                      S U P R E M E C O U R T O F             I N D I A
                                              RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for                       Special   Leave     to    Appeal     (C)......CC     No(s).
     24674-24678/2016

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/08/2016
     in ITA No. 19/2015, in ITA No. 21/2015, in ITA No. 326/2015, in ITA
     No. 476/2014 & in ITA No. 653/2012 passed by the High Court of
     Delhi at New Delhi)

     AMAN KHERA                  ETC.                                               Petitioner(s)
                                                           VERSUS

     COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - IX,                         ETC.                 Respondent(s)

     (With appln. (s) for c/delay in filing SLP)

     Date : 04/01/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI
                              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL

     For Petitioner(s)                      Mr.   Rohit Sharma, Adv.
                                            Mr.   S.K. Sharma, Adv.
                                            Mr.   Rounak Nayak, Adv.
                                            For   Kumar Dushyant Singh,AOR.
     For Respondent(s)

                               UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                  O R D E R

Learned counsel for the petitioners prays to withdraw the special leave petitions and states that the petitioner had paid some tax in the subsequent years which now should become refundable and he would be moving an appropriate application for refund thereof. If permissible in law, the petitioner can do so.

Insofar as this Court is concerned, nothing is observed on the merits of the aforesaid submissions.

As prayed for, the special leave petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by SWETA DHYANI Date: 2017.01.07 12:31:40 IST Reason:
                         (SWETA DHYANI)                              (MALA KUMARI SHARMA)
                             SR.P.A                                     COURT MASTER