Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Naraindas Parmanand Sanatorium Trust vs Aakar Enterprises And 8 Ors on 13 March, 2023

Author: R.I. Chagla

Bench: R.I. Chagla

 Darshan Patil                                                   25-ia-2034-20.odt


      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
          ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

            INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2034 OF 2020
                              IN
                     SUIT NO. 68 OF 2016

 Naraindas Parmanand
 Sanatorium Trust                             ..Applicant/Plaintiff
      VS.
 Aakar Enterprises
 and 8 Ors.                                   ..Respondents/Defendants


 Adv. Vyom Shah a/w Mr. Jesse Cornelious i/b Lexicon Law
 Partners for the Applicant/Plaintiff.

 Adv. Jehaan Mehta a/w Adv. Yazad Udwadia a/w Adv. Ruchi
 Gandhi i/b D.M. Legal Associates for the Defendant Nos. 1 to
 5.

 Adv. Vijay Kurle a/w C. Acharya a/w Sankit Shah for
 Defendant No. 6.

                                     ------------
                                      CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA, J

                                       DATED : 13 MARCH 2023
 P.C. :

 1.      By this Interim Application, the Applicant/Original

 Plaintiff is seeking permission to amend the cause title of

 the Suit by adding proposed Defendant Nos. 10 and 11 as

 Party/Defendant as well as carrying out the schedule of

 amendments              to    the   Plaint   annexed       to     the      Interim

 Application.


                                                                                    1/4




::: Uploaded on - 15/03/2023                       ::: Downloaded on - 16/03/2023 08:17:08 :::
 Darshan Patil                                                    25-ia-2034-20.odt


2.     The Applicant/Original Plaintiff has stated that the suit

property is being dealt with by Defendant Nos. 1 to 5 by

creating mortgages in favour of the proposed Defendant

Nos. 10 and 11 which are subsequent to the filing of the

Suit. These are in relation to the financial facilities which

are being availed of by Defendant Nos. 1 to 5 from the

proposed        Defendant          No.         10.   Further,   the   proposed

Defendant No. 11 is sought to be joined, in view of what has

been averred to in sub-paragraph (bb) of paragraph no. 4 of

the Interim Application wherein it is stated that Defendant

No. 5 has entered into and executed an Understanding/Term

Sheet dated 04/08/2013 with proposed Defendant No. 11 to

jointly develope the suit property with a contribution of Rs.

63,50,00,000/- (in words Sixty Three Crore Fifty Lakh) each.

3.     Accordingly, the applicant has submitted that the

proposed Defendant Nos. 10 and 11 are claiming to have

interest in the suit property as averred to in paragraph nos.

5 and 6 of the Interim Application. Accordingly, they have

sought to joined as Defendants.

4.     The learned counsel appearing for Defendant Nos. 1 to

5 has no objection to the pre-trial amendment being allowed


                                                                                  2/4




                ::: Uploaded on - 15/03/2023                          ::: Downloaded on - 16/03/2023 08:17:08 :::
  Darshan Patil                                                 25-ia-2034-20.odt


 subject to the rights and contentions of Defendant Nos. 1 to

 5 being kept open to deal with the same upon the

 amendment being carried out.

 5.      The learned counsel appearing for Respondent No. 6

 states that an Interim Application has been taken out for the

 transposition of Respondent No. 6 as Plaintiff. The Interim

 Application has not been listed today. Accordingly, list the

 Interim Application (L) NO. 2557 of 2023 on 20/03/2023.

 6.      Having considered the averments in the Interim

 Application, it does appear that the proposed Defendant

 Nos. 10 and 11 are necessary parties to the above Suit. This

 is borne out from the documents which have been annexed

 to the Interim Application as well as the fact that Defendant

 Nos. 1 to 5 have had allegedly dealings with the proposed

 Defendant Nos. 10 and 11 in the suit property either by way

 of    mortgage            allegedly   created   and/or        alleged        joint

 development agreement entered into by Defendant Nos. 1

 to 5 with the proposed Defendant No. 11. Accordingly, the

 amendment sought for is being allowed subject to the rights

 and contentions of the Defendant Nos. 1 to 5 to deal with

 the amended plaint as and when the amendment is carried


                                                                                  3/4




::: Uploaded on - 15/03/2023                     ::: Downloaded on - 16/03/2023 08:17:08 :::
 Darshan Patil                                         25-ia-2034-20.odt


out being kept open. Hence, the following order.

                                           ORDER

(a) The Applicants/Original Plaintiffs are permitted to carry out the amendment of the plaint in accordance with the schedule annexed to the Interim Application, thereby adding Respondent Nos. 10 and 11 herein as Defendants Nos. 10 and 11 to the Suit as well as consequential amendments.

(b) The amendments shall be carried out by the Applicants/Original Plaintiffs within a period of one week from the date of this order.

(c) The Interim Application is disposed of.

[R.I. CHAGLA J.] 4/4 ::: Uploaded on - 15/03/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 16/03/2023 08:17:08 :::