Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 2]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai

Jcit (Osd) Circle-8(3)(1), Mumbai vs M/S.Tata Power Renewable Energy ... on 28 August, 2019

                आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण "E" न्यायपीठ मुंबई में।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL " E" BENCH, MUMBAI

 श्री महावीर स हिं , न्याययक           दस्य एविं श्री राजेश कुमार लेखा    दस्य के   मक्ष।
      BEFORE SRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM AND SRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM

                 Aayakr ApIla saM . /       ITA No. 1492/Mum/2018
                 (inaQa- a rNa baYa-    / Assessment Year 2013-14)

 The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD)
 Circle-8(3)(1), Dy. CIT, Circle, 6th Floor,
 6th Floor, Room No. 615, Aayakar Bhavan,                                 ................ Applicant
 M.K. Road, Churchgate, Mumbai-400 020

 PAN - AABCI7118M

                                                  v/s

 Tata Power Renewable Energy Ltd.
 5th Floor, Corporate Centre,                                            ................Respondent
 Bloc "B" Carnac bunder, Mumbai-400 009


अपीलार्थी की ओर े / Appellant by              :    Shri Rajesh Kumar Mishra, DR
प्रत्यर्थी की ओर े / Respondent by            :    Shri Milin Thakore, AR

             ुनवाई की तारीख / Date of hearing:                  28.08.2019
           घोषणा की तारीख / Date of pronouncement : 28.08.2019


                                       AadoSa / O R D E R

 महावीर स हुं , न्याययक दस्य/
 PER MAHAVIR SINGH, JM:

This appeal of the Revenue is arising out of the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-14, Mumbai in Appeal No. CIT(A)-14/IT-174/16-17 dated 12.12.2017. The Assessment was framed by the Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax-Circle 8(3)(1), Mumbai (in short

2|Page I T A N o . 1 4 9 2 / MU M/ 2 0 1 8 DCIT/ITO/ AO) for AY 2013-14 vide dated 30.03.2016, under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter 'the Act').

2. This appeal contains the quantum addition of ₹ 1,04,82,619/- which is in dispute before the Department stated by the learned Counsel . The learned Counsel for the assessee stated that the tax effect of this addition is ₹ 34,01,086/-, which is below the low tax effect as prescribed vide CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 vide F.No. 279/Misc.142/2007-ITJ(Pt.) dated 08.08.2019, wherein the monetary limit for filing of appeal before ITAT is enhanced to ₹ 50 lacs. We noted that vide this circular No. 17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 a amendment was made to CBDT Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 vide F.No. 279/Misc. 142/2007-ITJ (Pt) increasing the monetary limit for filing of appeal before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal i.e. ₹ 50 lacs in each of the case from the monetary limit of ₹ 20 lacs. We noted that earlier Circular No. 3 of 2018 was made applicable to pending appeals also and this clause of the circular remains unchanged even after the amendment. Admittedly, in this case tax effect is below prescribed limit for filing of appeal before the Tribunal by the Revenue i.e. ₹ 50 lacs.

3. When this was confronted to the learned Sr. Departmental Representative, he could not point out that this appeal falls under any of the exception as provided in Circular No. 3 of 2018, which are applicable to the present circular no. 17/2019. Now, before us, the learned CIT Departmental Representative only requested that he want to verify whether this appeal falls under any of the exception as provided in CBDT Circular No. 3/2018. Here, we are giving liberty to Revenue, that in case, after passing the order, it comes to the notice of the Revenue that this appeal does falls under any exception of the CBDT Circular No. 3/18, the

3|Page I T A N o . 1 4 9 2 / MU M/ 2 0 1 8 AO can move for recalling of the order within the prescribed time limit under section 254(2) of the Act. Admittedly, the tax effect in this appeal of Revenue is much below the prescribed limit of filing appeal before the Tribunal i.e. ₹ 50 lacs as per CBDT circular No. 17 of 2019. In view of the above, this appeal of Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn in view of Circular No. 17 of 2019.

4. In the Result, the appeal of Revenue is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open court on 28.08.2019.

                  Sd/-                                                       Sd/-
    (राजेश कुमार / RAJESH KUMAR)                              (महावीर स हिं /MAHAVIR SINGH)
(लेखा    दस्य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)                        (न्याययक     दस्य/ JUDICIAL MEMBER)

मुिंबई, ददनािंक/ Mumbai, Dated: 28.08.2019 दीप रकार, व.यिजी धिव / Sudip Sarkar, Sr.PS आदे श की प्रयिसलपप अग्रेपिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to :

1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant
2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent.
3. आयकर आयुक्त(अपील) / The CIT(A)
4. आयकर आयुक्त / CIT
5. ववभागीय प्रयतयनधि, आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, मिंब ु ई / DR, ITAT, Mumbai
6. गार्ड फाईल / Guard file.

आदे शाि ार/ BY ORDER, त्यावपत प्रयत //True Copy// उप/ हायक पुंजीकार (Asstt. Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, मुिंबई / ITAT, Mumbai