Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi

Shailendra Sharan Singh vs M/O Home Affairs on 28 March, 2023

                                      1
                                                         O.A. No. 1040/2017
Item No. 63 (C-5)



                    CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
                       PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI

                             O.A. No. 1040/2017

                      This the 28th Day of March, 2023

       Hon'ble Mr. Tarun Shridhar, Member (A)
       Hon'ble Mrs. Pratima K. Gupta, Member (J)

       Sh. Shailendra Sharan Singh
       Group "A"
       Posted as DCIO/Exe., IB
       Slo Late Sh.Mahima Sharan Singh
       Aged about 48 years
       Rlo VP-145-C, Pitampura
       Delhi-110034
                                                            ....Applicant
       (By Advocate : Mr. Nilansh Gaur)

                                     VERSUS

       1. Union of India
       The Secretary
       Ministry of Home Affairs
       Govt. of India
       North BIock, New Delhi-110001

       2. The Director
       Intelligence Bureau
       IB, Headquarter
       35, Sardar Patel Marg
       New Delhi-110021

       3. Sh. Dawa Tshering Sherpa, DCIO /Exe.
       PIS No. 124289

       A. Sh.Ashuli Kholi, DCIO / Exe.
       PIS No. 124340

       5. Sh.Ravinder Kumar Singh, DCIO/Exe.
       PIS No. 126704
       (Affected parties in representative capacity
       All working as DCIOs with the official
       Respondents and to be served along with
       All other similarly situated through
       the official respondents)

                                                      .... RESPONDENTS

       (By Advocate : Mr. Rajeev Kumar)
                                     2
                                                       O.A. No. 1040/2017
Item No. 63 (C-5)



                               ORDER (ORAL)

Hon'ble Mr. Tarun Shridhar, Member (A) Learned counsel for the applicant submits that by virtue of another OA, the relief sought by the applicant in the present one stands awarded in his favour. Therefore, he does not wish to press this OA.

2. In view of the categorical statement made by the learned counsel for the OA, the OA stands disposed of as having become infructuous.

There shall be no orders as to costs.





          (Pratima K. Gupta)                 (Tarun Shridhar)
             Member (J)                        Member (A)

       /NISHA/