Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 9, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Sanjeev Kumar vs State Of Haryana on 4 August, 2021

Author: Suvir Sehgal

Bench: Suvir Sehgal

CRM-M-54719 of 2019                                             {1}


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                       AT CHANDIGARH

203-2                                     CRM-M-54719 of 2019
                                          Date of decision:04.08.2021


Sanjeev Kumar                                  ... Petitioner

                           Vs.

State of Haryana                               ... Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL

Present:-    Mr. Namit Khurana, Advocate
             for the petitioner.

             Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana.

SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral)

The Court has been convened through video conferencing due to Covid-19 pandemic.

Through the instant petition, the petitioners seek anticipatory bail in case FIR No.138 dated 18.11.2019 registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 324, 427, 504, 506 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, however, Section 326 of IPC, was added later on, at Police Station Buria, District Yamuna Nagar.

On 24.01.2020, following order was passed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that only allegation against the petitioner is that he had beaten the mother of the complainant, namely, Santosh and had damaged some vehicles and had walked away after giving threat to the 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 05-08-2021 23:50:19 ::: CRM-M-54719 of 2019 {2} complainant party.

Notice of motion for 25.03.2020.

Meanwhile, the petitioner shall join the investigation and would come present as and when called for and in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be admitted to interim bail on his furnishing personal and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C." Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Santokh Singh submits that petitioner has joined investigation and is no longer required for custodial interrogation. He has further instructions to state that petitioner is not involved in any other criminal case.

In view of the above facts, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated 24.01.2020 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.


                                                (SUVIR SEHGAL)
                                                    JUDGE
August 04, 2021
savita
Whether Speaking/Reasoned                                  Yes/No
Whether Reportable                                         Yes/No




                                2 of 2
             ::: Downloaded on - 05-08-2021 23:50:19 :::