Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Hussain Anis Momin @ Mohd. Hussain Mohd. ... vs The State Of Maharashtra on 21 December, 2020

Author: Prakash D. Naik

Bench: Prakash D. Naik

                      Ganesh Lokhande                           1 of 4                39-BA-2445-19.doc




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                    CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2445 OF 2019
                      Hussain Anis Momin @ Mohd. Hussain                      ...Applicant

                               Versus

                      The State of Maharashtra                                ...Respondent
                                                       .....
                      Mr. L. M. Shukla, Advocate for the Applicant.
                      Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for the Respondent - State.
                      Mr. Rameshwar Prabhakar Darade, API Bhoiwada Police Station,
                      Bhiwandi, Thane City.
                                                       .....
                                                    CORAM :      PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
                                                    DATE :       21st DECEMBER, 2020.
                      PC :

                      1.                This is an application under Section 439 of Code of

                      Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.PC" for short) seeking bail in

                      connection with C.R. No. I-181 of 2018 registered with Bhoiwada

                      Police Station, Bhiwandi, Thane City for the offences punishable

                      under Sections 364(A), 363, 302, 201 r/w. 34 of Indian Penal Code,

                      1860 ("IPC" for short) were added. Applicant was arrested on 3 rd

                      November, 2018.


                      2.                The first informant is the father of victim boy aged about

                      15 years. The First Information Report ("FIR" for short) dated 29 th
         Digitally
         signed by
         RajeP.
                      October, 2018 was lodged against unknown persons. Victim's body
RajeP.   Aher
Aher     Date:
         2020.12.22
         16:10:07     was found on 2nd November, 2018. It is the case of the prosecution
         +0530


                      that the accused had demanded the amount from the complainant.
 Ganesh Lokhande                        2 of 4                  39-BA-2445-19.doc




The threatening calls were made even after the death of victim boy.

During the course of investigation accused were arrested. Charge-

sheet is filed.


3.                Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the

applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. There is no

evidence to show his involvement in the crime. The prosecution is

relying upon the extra-judicial-confessions of the co-accused. There is

no evidence to show that the applicant is involved in kidnapping the

victim boy or killing him. The prosecution is relying upon the CDR.

Although, the mobile phone bearing Number 8421489008 were

allegedly seized from the possession of the applicant, the sim card

was in the name of Samir Sayed. His statement has not been

recorded. There is no evidence to show that the applicant had made

call to the complainant. There is discrepancies in respect to IMEI last

digit number referred as '0'.


4.                Learned   APP   submitted     that   there   is     strong

circumstantial evidence against the applicant. He was found in

possession of mobile phone, CDR shows that the call was made from

the said phone to the informant. On 30 th October, 2018 the CDR

location of the said phone at the time of call was shown to be in

Gujarat.
 Ganesh Lokhande                           3 of 4             39-BA-2445-19.doc




5.                The FIR is lodged against the unknown person. There is

no eye witness to the incident. The case is based on circumstantial

evidence. The statement of some of the witnesses recorded under

Section 164 of Cr.PC refers to extra-judicial-confession of the co-

accused. There is no such confession by the applicant. There is no

other incriminating recovery at the instance of the applicant to show

his complicity in the crime. Sim card appears to be in name of

another person, whose statement has not been recorded. The

prosecution is harping upon the CDR report. In the absence of any

other strong evidence, bail cannot be denied to the applicant. He is

in custody from 3rd November, 2018. Although, it is the case of the

prosecution that the cell phone was sold by two persons. Witness

Mukesh Prakash Chhablani identified the applicant and another

person. However, there is no T.I. parade conducted by Investigating

Officer and the identification was in front of the police when the

accused were produced before him. There are no criminal

antecedents against the applicant. Considering these circumstances,

bail can be granted to the applicant.


6.                Hence, I pass the following order.
 Ganesh Lokhande                          4 of 4                   39-BA-2445-19.doc




                                     ORDER

i) Bail Application No. 2445 of 2019, is allowed;

ii) The applicant is directed to be released on bail in connection with C.R. No. I-181 of 2018 registered with Bhoiwada Police Station, Bhiwandi on furnishing P.R. bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/-(Twenty Five Thousand) with one or more sureties in the like amount;

iii) The applicant shall report concerned police station once in a month on every first Saturday between 11.00 am. to 1.00 pm. till further order.

iv) Applicant is permitted to furnish cash bail security in the sum of Rs.25,000/- for the period of eight weeks in lieu of surety;

v) Bail Application No. 2445 of 2019 stands disposed of accordingly.

vi) This order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary/Personal Assistant of this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a digitally signed copy of this order.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)