Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 8]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Pratap Singh vs Union Of India on 11 January, 2017

                              COMMON CONDITIONAL ORDER
                     IN MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL NOS. 1001 TO 1032
                              ON THE BOARD DATED 11.1.2017
                          DUE TO NON-COMPLIANCE OF COURT ORDER
11.1.2017
                     The Court proposes to pass this common conditional order to
            obviate passing of identical conditional order in these matters involving
            similar office objection/default.

                     In all these matters, due to non-removal of office objection within
            the prescribed time as per the Rules, the concerned matter was placed
            before the Registrar in the first instance. The Registrar granted sufficient
            time     to    the   petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s)     to   cure   the
            defect/office objection, however, due to             non-removal of office
            objection/default within the prescribed time, the concerned matter was
            required to be once again listed before the Court. The Court granted
            further time, by passing common order on the earlier occasion.

                     In spite of repeated opportunity (three times-one under Rules,
            second by the Registrar and third by Court), the petitioner(s)/
            applicant(s)/appellant(s) has failed to cure the office objection/default.
            As a result, by way of indulgence and last opportunity, in terms of this
            order,        SIX    WEEKS'     further      time   is      granted    to    the
            petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/ appellant(s) in the respective matters to
            remove office objection/default and make the matter ready for further
            hearing        within   that    time,     failing   which      the    concerned
            petition/application/appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution
            without further reference to the Court.

                     Provided, however, in cases, where the objection/default
            is about non-service of any of the respondent, on expiry of the

extended period, the concerned matter will stand dismissed for non-prosecution only against the unserved respondent(s), without further reference to the Court. The matter would then proceed against the remaining respondent(s).

In cases where the office objection/default has already been cured before passing of this order, it will be open to the concerned party to bring that fact to the notice of the Registrar (Judicial-II), who may examine the same and proceed with the matter as per the listing scheme, if ready for hearing.

If the office objections are removed within the time extended in terms of this order, the concerned matter(s) be made returnable on the date notified hereafter:

S.No. Cases as per Cause List No. Returnable Date 1 1001 to 1020 28/2/17 2 1021 to 1032 01/3/17 ` (J.K.Maheshwari) Judge