Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Nitin Jain vs Rajendra Kumar (2023/Rjjd/014767) on 11 May, 2023

Author: Farjand Ali

Bench: Farjand Ali

                                   [2023/RJJD/014767]

                                         HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                                                          JODHPUR
                                                    S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 540/2019

                                   Nitin Jain S/o Hanuman Singh, Aged About 27 Years, By Caste
                                   Jat, R/o 120M, Vinoba Basti, District Sri Ganganagar.
                                                                                                             ----Appellant
                                                                            Versus
                                   Rajendra Kumar S/o Khanchand, By Caste Arora, R/o Ward No.
                                   21, 63, Vinoba Basti, Beside Teimsy Beauty Parlor, District
                                   Sriganganagar.
                                                                                                           ----Respondent


                                   For Appellant(s)               :     Mr. Pankaj Kumar Gupta
                                   For Respondent(s)              :     Mr. Abhishek Purohit, AGA
                                                                        Mr. R.S. Makad



                                                    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order 11/05/2023

1. Upon perusal of the judgment impugned, it is revealing that a cheque was allegedly given by the accused-respondent to the petitioner, which upon presentation got dishnoured owing to reason of insufficiency of funds in the account of the accused. There seems reasonable grounds to allow the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the impugned judgment.

2. Accordingly, the instant application seeking leave to appeal is allowed. The memo of leave to appeal application shall be treated and registered as an appeal.

3. Office to proceed.

(FARJAND ALI),J 76-Ashutosh/-

(Downloaded on 12/05/2023 at 10:00:23 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)