Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Sadam Mefuz Khan And Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 16 February, 2024

Bench: Prakash D. Naik, N.R.Borkar

2024:BHC-AS:8157-DB


                                                      1 of 2                         26.APL.1657.2023.doc




                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1657 OF 2023

                 Sadam Mefuz Khan and others                                          Applicants
                              versus
                 The State of Maharashtra and another                                 Respondents

                 Mr.Parag S. Mishra with Niraj K. Tripathi, Advocate for Applicants.
                 Mrs.M.M.Deshmukh, Additional P.P for State.
                 Mr.Jeetandra K. Rajguru i/by Taha Khan for Respondent no.2.
                 API Suhel Pathan, Kashimira Police Station, present.

                                               CORAM :         PRAKASH D. NAIK AND
                                                               N.R.BORKAR, JJ.

                                               DATE    :       16th February 2024
                 PC :



                 1.       Applicants are chargesheeted for the offences under Sections
                 498-A, 354, 323, 324, 504, 506 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code and the
                 proceedings are pending in the Court of 4 th Joint Civil Judge and
                 Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thane vide R.C.C No.1123 of 2023.
                 The FIR was registered at the instance of Respondent no.2 on 9 th
                 August 2022 vide FIR No.551 of 2022 with Kashimira Police Station,
                 Thane, for the aforesaid offences.            The parties have resolved the
                 dispute. It is jointly prayed that proceedings be quashed and set
                 aside with the consent of complainant.

                 2.       The proceedings under Protection of Women from Domestic
                 Violence Act were initiated by Respondent no.2 in the Court of
                 Metropolitan Magistrate, 59th Court, Kurla, Mumbai.                     In view of
                 settlement between parties, Consent Terms were filed in the said
                 Court on 29th November 2023. In view of the terms stipulated in the




                ::: Uploaded on - 21/02/2024                        ::: Downloaded on - 28/02/2024 16:23:07 :::
                                    2 of 2                         26.APL.1657.2023.doc


 Consent Terms, the complainant has no objection for quashing the
 impugned proceedings.

 3.       Respondent no.2 has also filed affidavit dated 22 nd January
 2024 stating that matrimonial discord between Respondent no.2/
 complainant and Applicants has been resolved amicably and they
 have jointly filed Consent Terms in the proceedings under Domestic
 Violence Act. Respondent no.2 is present in the Court. She has
 admitted the contents of affidavit and consent terms. She has
 expressed her no objection for quashing the proceedings.

 4.       Considering the fact that parties have amicably settled the
 dispute, the prayers sought in the application can be granted.

                                  ORDER

(i) Criminal Application is allowed and disposed off;

(ii) The proceedings in R.C.C No.1123 of 2023 pending before 4 th Joint Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Thane arising out of FIR No.551 of 2022 registered with Kashimira Police Station, District Thane, are quashed and set aside.

(N.R.BORKAR, J.) (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) MST ::: Uploaded on - 21/02/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 28/02/2024 16:23:07 :::