Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Karnataka High Court

Sri Divakar Patil T S vs The State Of Karnataka on 10 September, 2012

Author: Ram Mohan Reddy

Bench: Ram Mohan Reddy

                            1

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

        DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012

                         BEFORE

      THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY

        WRIT PETITION No.35568 OF 2012 (EDN-AD)


BETWEEN

       SRI DIVAKAR PATIL T S
       S/O SOMEGOWDA
       AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS
       THIPPUR VILLAGE
       KASABA HOBLI
       GUBBI TALUK
       TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101.
                                         ... PETITIONER

(By Sri. JAGADEESHACHARI, ADVOCATE )

AND

1.     THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
       EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
       VEEDHANA SOUDHA
       BANGALORE-560001
       REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
       GOVT OF KARNATAKA

2.     THE DIRECTOR
       BOARD OF TECHNICAL EXAMINATION
       BANGALORE-560001

3.     THE PRINCIPAL
       SRI SIDDARAMESHWARA POLYTECHNIC
       HASSAN ROAD, TIPTURA TALUK
       TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101
                                2

4.    THE PRESIDENT
      SRI SIDDARAMESHWARA POLYTECHNIC
      HASSAN ROAD, TIPTURA TALUK
      TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101.     ... RESPONDENTS

(By Sri. R. OMKUMAR, AGA )

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PERMIT THE PETITIONER
TO ADMISSION OF THE 5TH SEMESTER IN 3 YEARS
DIPLOMA COURSE FOR MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND
PERMIT HIM TO STUDY THE SAME; AND ETC.

     THIS  WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON                      FOR
PRL.HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE                       THE
FOLLOWING:

                          ORDER

Learned counsel for the parties submit that facts of this case and question for decision making are identical to the facts and question that arose for consideration in W.P. Nos.32330- 437/2012.

2. According to the learned counsel this petition may be disposed off in the like terms as directed in the order dt. 10.9.2012 in W.P.32330-437/2012.

The petition is ordered accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE ln.