Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Nisar Hasan Maste vs Rahul Mukund Juker on 16 February, 2022

Bench: A. A. Sayed, Abhay Ahuja

          Digitally signed
ANANT     by ANANT
          KRISHNA NAIK
KRISHNA   Date:                                        1/2
NAIK      2022.02.17
          16:25:39 +0530                                                          905.IA.773.2022.doc


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                  INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 773 OF 2022
                                                  IN
                                   CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 423 OF 2021

                   Nisar Hasan Maste                               ...Applicant
                   IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
                   Rahul Mukund Juker                              ... Petitioner
                        Versus
                   Mr. Sudhakar Deshmukh & Ors.                    ...Respondents

Mr Suresh Sabrad i/b. Adv. Suraj Naik for the Applicant IA/773/2022 Mr. Atul Damle, Sr. Counsel i/b Mr. R. D. Suryawanshi for the Petitioner in CP/423/2021 Mr. M. J. Bhatt for the Respondent No. 2 in CP/423/2021 CORAM : A. A. SAYED & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ DATED : 16th FEBRUARY, 2022 P.C.:

The Interim Application is taken out seeking the following relief:
(a) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to correct the appearance of the advocate for the Applicant in the order dated 02.12.2021 wrongly shown as Advocate for Respondent No. 3 passed in Contempt Petition No. 423 of 2021 and record appearance of the Advocate for the applicant appearing in Civil Application No. 1495 of 2018

2. Learned Counsel for the Applicant has rightly pointed out that in the order dated 02.12.2022 passed in Contempt Petition AKN 1/2 2/2

905.IA.773.2022.doc No. 423 of 2021 the appearance of the Advocate for the Applicant is wrongly shown as appearing for the Respondent No. 3.

3. In the circumstances, the Interim Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The appearances in the order dated 02.12.2022 passed in Contempt Petition No. 423 of 2021 be corrected accordingly.

4. The Interim Application to stand disposed of.

5. List the Contempt Petition on 16th March, 2022.

(ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (A. A. SAYED, J.) AKN 2/2