Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 7]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Amal Kumar Chaudhuri vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 20 July, 2022

Author: Rajasekhar Mantha

Bench: Rajasekhar Mantha

20.07.2022
Item No.455
Ct. No.13
CHC


                                  W.P.A No. 11379 of 2022


                                 Amal Kumar Chaudhuri
                                         Vs.
                         The State of West Bengal & Ors.



              Mrs. Sabita Khutia (Bhunya)        ... for the petitioner.


              Mr. Somnath Mukhopadhya                  ... for the State.




                      Affidavit of service filed in Court today be kept

              with the record.

                      The petitioner was an 'Assistant Teacher' of a

              High School, who retired from service on 31.12.2017. The

              first pension payment order was issued on 12.04.2018.

              Under the ROPA Rules, 2019 there was revision of the

              pensionary and gratuity amount payable to the petitioner.

              The revised pension payment order was issued on

              26.05.2022 and the gratuity and revised arrear pension

              was disbursed on 28.05.2022 in terms of ROPA, 2019.

              The petitioner claims interest on delayed payment of the

              revised gratuity and revised arrear pension amount.

                      There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ

              petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating

              that there is no statutory period of limitation and neither
                              2




parties have suffered due to this delay. It is the

submission of the petitioner that accordingly the petition

should be allowed.

        The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P. 17557

(W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha vs. State of West

Bengal & Ors.) wherein a co-ordinate Bench had relied

upon the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Union of

India vs. Tarsem Singh, reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on

the issue of limitation relating to payment or refixation of

pay or pension wherein the Apex Court had held that

relief may be granted in spite of delay as it does not affect

the rights of the third party.

        In view of the above and after hearing the learned

Counsel for the parties, I direct the Director of Pension,

Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of

West Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to pay

interest to the petitioner @ 8% per annum on the revised

gratuity and revised arrear pension calculated on and

from 14.02.2020 till the date of actual payment. Such

payment is to be made within a period of eight weeks

from the date of communication of this order.

        With these observations, the writ petition is

disposed of.

        Since, no affidavit-in-opposition has been called

for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed

to have not been admitted by the respondents.

There shall be no order as to costs.

3

Urgent certified photo copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously on compliance of usual legal formalities.

(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)