Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Shobana vs The District Collector on 25 June, 2025

Author: N.Anand Venkatesh

Bench: N. Anand Venkatesh

                                                                                       WP No. 2160 of 2023




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 25-06-2025

                                                         CORAM

                         THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

                                                WP No. 2160 of 2023

                1. Shobana
                W/o. Late Jothiraj

                                                                                       Petitioner(s)

                                                              Vs

                1. The District Collector
                Coimbatore District, Coimbatore

                2.The Tahsildar
                Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District

                3.The Assistant Engineer
                PWD / WRO Sultanpettai

                4.Selvaraj
                S/o. Krishnaswamy Valasupalayam J.
                Krishnapuram village sulur taluk
                Coimbatore District

                                                                                       Respondent(s)

                PRAYER
                                                                                 nd
                Calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the 2 respondent
                dated 06.12.2022 vide Na.Ka.No. 2649 / 2022 / A2 quash the same.




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 02/07/2025 04:09:03 pm )
                                                                                           WP No. 2160 of 2023



                                  For Petitioner(s):       Mr.R.Kannan

                                  For Respondent(s):       Mr.M.Guruprasath for R4
                                                           Ms.P.Aishwarya
                                                           Government Advocate for R1 & 2

                                                             ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for challenging the impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 06.12.2022, wherein the petitioner has been directed to restore the original position and to ensure the free flow of water into the agricultural land belonging to the 4th respondent.

2. Heard Mr.R.Kannan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.Guruprasath, learned counsel for the 4th respondent and Ms.P.Aishwarya, learned Government Advocate, learned counsel for the 1st and 2nd respondents.

3. The grievance expressed by the petitioner in the present writ petition is that the 4th respondent had requested the predecessor in title to form a small channel inside the land to fetch water from the Parambikulam Aliyar Project (PAP) canal. This was permitted by the predecessor, and the channel was located in the center of the land. Since the said canal was not used by the 4 th respondent for a long period, the canal itself became unusable. The petitioner thereafter made a provision on the southern side of the property to ensure that water flows freely into the agricultural land belonging to the 4th respondent. A complaint was given by the 4th respondent, and the 2nd respondent, through https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/07/2025 04:09:03 pm ) WP No. 2160 of 2023 impugned proceedings dated 06.12.2022, has directed the petitioner to restore the original position and ensure that water flows smoothly into the agricultural land belonging to the 4th respondent.

4. It is seen that the agricultural lands are being irrigated under the PAP. The water for such irrigation is carried through small canals, which are called field bothies. The field bothy itself is a part of the PAP scheme. The Tamil Nadu Irrigation Projects (Construction of Field Bothies) Act, 1959 governs the fields. If any field bothy is to be destroyed or removed, such a decision can be taken only by the District Collector. It seems that during the year 2022, the petitioner had levelled the property and thereby also levelled the field bothy and attempted to create a new way on the southern side of the property. The grievance expressed by the 4th respondent is that the water flow was obstructed since the levelling affected the flow into the agricultural land. The fact remains that whenever there is rain, water flows into the agricultural land of the 4th respondent. However, the water that is released under the PAP is being obstructed. The petitioner is bound by the provisions of the said Act, and the petitioner cannot obstruct the water flow from the PAP main canal to the Ayakattu land. It is under these circumstances that the order came to be passed by the 2nd respondent.

5. This Court is not able to find any illegality in the order passed by the 2nd respondent warranting interference of this Court. In view of the same, the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/07/2025 04:09:03 pm ) WP No. 2160 of 2023 writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed.

25-06-2025 gd Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/07/2025 04:09:03 pm ) WP No. 2160 of 2023 To

1.The District Collector Coimbatore District, Coimbatore

2.The Tahsildar Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District

3.The Assistant Engineer PWD / WRO Sultanpettai https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/07/2025 04:09:03 pm ) WP No. 2160 of 2023 N.ANAND VENKATESH J.

gd WP No. 2160 of 2023 25-06-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 02/07/2025 04:09:03 pm )