Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Sharad Kumar Sharma vs Indira Gandhi National Open University ... on 5 September, 2019

Author: Vanaja N Sarna

Bench: Vanaja N Sarna

                           क य सच  ु ना आयोग
                   CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                            बाबा गंगनाथ माग
                           Baba Gangnath Marg
                       मु नरका, नई द ल - 110067
                       Munirka, New Delhi-110067

                              Decision no.: CIC/IGNOU/A/2018/617900/01561
                                          File no.: CIC/IGNOU/A/2018/617900


In the matter of:
Sharad Kumar Sharma
                                                             ... Appellant
                                      VS
Central Public Information Officer
Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU)
Maidan Garhi, New Delhi - 110 068
                                                            ... Respondent

RTI application filed on : 27/12/2017 CPIO replied on : 30/01/2018 First appeal filed on : 09/02/2018 First Appellate Authority order : 08/03/2018 Second Appeal dated : 23/04/2018 Date of Hearing : 04/09/2019 Date of Decision : 04/09/2019 The following were present:

Appellant: Present over VC Respondent: Smt. Anita Kumari Raj, Section Officer and CPIO, present in person Information Sought:
The appellant has sought the following information:
1. Which paramedical courses are conducted by IGNOU through regular medium (face to face mode).
2. Which State Government or Central Government has authorised IGNOU to conduct paramedical courses through regular medium. Provide certified photocopy of the authorisation given.
1
3. Which State Government or Central Government has authorised IGNOU to conduct B.Sc. (Hons.) in Optometry and Ophthalmic Tech. (BSCHOT).
4. And other related information.

Grounds for Second Appeal The CPIO did not provide the desired information.

Submissions made by Appellant and Respondent during Hearing:

The appellant was asked during hearing that whether the recent revised reply dated 28.08.2019 was received. He submitted that he is out of station hence is not aware of the same.
The CPIO submitted that an appropriate updated reply has been sent to the appellant.
Observations:
Based on a perusal of the record, it is noted that the reply given is pointwise. However, a copy of the same may be immediately sent to the appellant to his e-mail id [email protected] Decision:
The CPIO is accordingly directed to resend the reply dated 28.08.2019 via e- mail within 3 days from the date of receipt of this order.
The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
Vanaja N. Sarna (वनजा एन. सरना) Information Commissioner (सच ू ना आय! ु त) Authenticated true copy (अ भ मा णत स या पत त) A.K. Assija (ऐ.के. असीजा) Dy. Registrar (उप-पंजीयक) 011- 26182594 / दनांक / Date 2