Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

J.Christan vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 21 July, 2022

Author: J.Sathya Narayana Prasad

Bench: J.Sathya Narayana Prasad

                                                                                         W.P.No.6967 of 2011

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                   DATED : 21.07.2022

                                                        CORAM :
                        THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD

                                      Writ Petition No.6967 of 2011
                                                          and
                                                    M.P.No.1 of 2011

                    1.J.Christan
                    2.J.Livingston                                     ... Petitioners

                                                            Vs.
                    1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,
                      Rep. by its Secretary to Government,
                      Health Department, Fort St.George,
                      Chennai – 600 009.

                    2.Director of Public Health &
                       Preventive Medicine, D.M.S.Complex,
                     Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.                        … Respondents



                              Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying
                    for issuance of Writ of Declaration, declaring that the non-selection of the
                    Petitioners' for 1-year Multi-Purpose Heath Worker (male) Training Course,
                    by adopting interview marks as sole criteria for selection, but by awarding
                    marks by using pencil, well paving way for irregularities, particularly making
                    way for alteration in the case of the petitioners', and at the same time non-
                    selecting the petitioners' despite the fact that they have correctly answered all


                    Page No.1 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                      W.P.No.6967 of 2011

                    the four questions posed on them by adopting surreptitious practice without
                    disclosing the marks, and without disclosing the cut-off marks fixed for
                    candidates according to communal reservation, and cut-off mark scored by
                    the last selected candidate under B.C. Quota is contrary to law, norms and
                    procedures, null and void illegal and invalid.


                              For Petitioners     :    Mr.A.Amal Raj

                              For Respondents    :    Mr.S.Ravichandran,
                                                Additional Government Pleader


                                             ORDER

The relief sought by the petitioners in this writ petition is to declare that the non-selection of the Petitioners' for 1-year Multi-Purpose Heath Worker (male) Training Course, by adopting interview marks as sole criteria for selection, but by awarding marks by using pencil, well paving way for irregularities, particularly making way for alteration in the case of the petitioners', and at the same time non-selecting the petitioners' despite the fact that they have correctly answered all the four questions posed on them by adopting surreptitious practice without disclosing the marks, and without disclosing the cut-off marks fixed for candidates according to communal reservation, and cut-off mark scored by the last selected candidate under B.C. Page No.2 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.6967 of 2011 Quota.

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he has no instruction from the petitioners.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submitted that the Government passed a G.O.Ms.No.269, Health dated 20.09.2010, for one year Multipurpose Health Worker (Male) Training Course for appointment as Health Inspector Grade-II. Subsequently, the interview was conducted and 300 candidates were selected for the said post based on the marks secured by them in the interview. Therefore, he submitted that the matter has become infructuous and nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.

3. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel on either side, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.




                    Page No.3 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                            W.P.No.6967 of 2011




                                                             21.07.2022

                    vm
                    Index      :      Yes/No
                    Speaking Order    :    Yes/No




                                                           J.SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD,J.

                                                                                           vm
                    To:

                    1.The Secretary to Government,
                      Government of Tamil Nadu,
                      Health Department, Fort St.George,
                      Chennai – 600 009.

                    2.Director of Public Health &
                       Preventive Medicine,
                      D.M.S.Complex,
                     Teynampet, Chennai – 600 006.

                                                      W.P.No.6967 of 2011




                    Page No.4 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                     W.P.No.6967 of 2011




                                          21.07.2022




                    Page No.5 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis