Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Parle Biscuits Pvt.Ltd vs Intelligence Inspector on 13 January, 2015

Author: A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar

Bench: A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar

       

  

   

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                               PRESENT:

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR

               TUESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/30TH POUSHA, 1936

                                   WP(C).No. 1990 of 2015 (W)
                                  -----------------------------------------

PETITIONER(S) :
--------------------------

                     PARLE BISCUITS PVT.LTD.,
                     BRANCH AT: VIII/230C, PARAKKAL ESTATE,
                     VAZHAKKULAM, AVT ROAD, ALUVA-683 105.
                     (REPRESENTED BY THE AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
                      J.M.GOMEZ).


                     BY ADVS.SRI.K.N.SREEKUMARAN
                              SRI.P.D.UNNIKKANNAN NAIR

RESPONDENT(S) :
----------------------------

          1.         INTELLIGENCE INSPECTOR,
                     SQUAD NO.III, COMMERCIAL TAXES,
                     MATTANCHERRY MINI CIVIL STATION, ALUVA.
                     CAMP AT: COMMERCIAL TAXES CHECK-POST, WALAYAR- 678 624.

          2.         COMMERCIAL TAX INSPECTOR,
                     COMMERCIAL TAXES, CHECK-POST,
                     WALAYAR- 678 624.

          3.         STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY
                     TO GOVERNMENT, TAXES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT
                     SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 001.


                     BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LILLY.K.T

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
            ON 20-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
           FOLLOWING:




Msd.

WP(C).No. 1990 of 2015 (W)
-----------------------------------------

                                            APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-------------------------------------

EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE LATEST RETURN FOR THE MONTH OF
                     DECEMBER 2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE ASSESSING
                     AUTHORITY.

EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE INVOICE BEARING NO.1808/1163
                     DATED 13.01.2015 FROM THE PETITIONER'S FACTORY IN MEDKAL,
                     TELENGANA.

EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE DETAILS OF E TOKEN UPLOADED BY THE
                     CONSIGNOR AND ACCOMPANYING THE TRANSPORT.

EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.OR 151/14-15 DATED 15.01.2015
                     ISSUED BY 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER.

EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED 16.01.2015 FILED BEFORE
                     THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------------------------
                                            NIL

                                                          //TRUE COPY//


                                                          P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.



                A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
               ........................................................
                         W.P.(C).No.1990 of 2015
               .........................................................
              Dated this the 20th day of January, 2015

                                  JUDGMENT

The petitioner, who is a registered dealer under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the KVAT Act)' is aggrieved by Ext.P4 notice issued to him detaining a consignment of potato wafers that was being transported from Andhra Pradesh to Kerala at his instance. In the writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the insistence of the respondents that the petitioner must pay the security deposit demanded in the detention notice as a condition for release of the goods and vehicle.

2. Heard Sri.K.N.Sreekumaran, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Lilly K.T, the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

3. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the Bar, I dispose the writ petition with the following directions:

(i) On a perusal of Ext.P4 detention notice it is seen that the 8F declaration that was produced showed that the goods that were being transported were biscuits whereas what was actually being W.P.(C).No.1990 of 2015 2 transported was potato wafers. In that view of the matter, the suspicion on the part of the respondents cannot be said to be unjustified. I take note, however, of the fact that the petitioner is a registered dealer in the State and also that the petitioner had since offered an explanation for the discrepancy in the declaration, and direct the 1st respondent to release the consignment and the vehicle on the petitioner paying 25% of the amount demanded as security deposit in Ext.P4 notice, and executing a simple bond without sureties for the balance amount therein before the 1st respondent.
(ii) The respondents shall thereafter transmit the files to the adjudicating authority who shall adjudicate the matter and pass orders, after hearing the petitioner, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
(iv) The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment and a copy of the writ petition before the respondents.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns/ W.P.(C).No.1990 of 2015 3