Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 10, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Navneet @ Neetu vs State Of Haryana on 19 November, 2015

            CRM-M No.30615 of 2015                                                   ::1::


                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                        AT CHANDIGARH

                                                         C.R.M-M No.30615 of 2015
                                                         Date of Decision : 19.11.2015


            Navneet @ Neetu
                                                                      ...... Petitioner

                                            versus


            State of Haryana
                                                                      ...... Respondent


            CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI
                                 ***

            Present :           Mr. Rajat Gautam, Advocate
                                for the petitioner.

                                Mr. S.S. Pannu, D.A.G, Haryana.
                                            ***

            1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
            2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
            3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

            AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)

This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.293 dated 29.11.2014, registered under Section 346 IPC & Sections 302, 201, 148, 149, 404, 364, 120-B IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act (added later on), at P.S. Narwana City, District Jind.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner has now been in custody for almost one year approximately and even the FSL on which emphasis was laid on the previous date does not conclusively point to the guilt. He has further argued that the trial is not likely to ASHISH 2015.11.20 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M No.30615 of 2015 ::2::

conclude in near future since not even a single witness has been examined till date.
Learned Deputy Advocate General has accepted that FSL report merely points out that blood stains on the shirt were human blood but has accepted that it does not show whether that blood either matches the blood of deceased or the petitioner. However, he states that the mobile of the deceased was recovered from the petitioner.
Be that as it may, keeping in view the above facts and the period of incarceration already suffered by the petitioner, without going into the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to release the petitioner on regular bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.
Ordered accordingly.
Petition stands allowed.
Since the main case has been decided, the pending criminal miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of.



                                                                  ( AJAY TEWARI )
            November 19, 2015                                          JUDGE
            ashish




ASHISH
2015.11.20 16:18
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document
Chandigarh