Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

A. Joy vs State Of Kerala on 6 July, 2017

Author: P.B.Suresh Kumar

Bench: P.B.Suresh Kumar

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                            PRESENT:

                     THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

                THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAYOF JULY 2017/15TH ASHADHA, 1939

                                   WP(C).No. 22370 of 2017 (U)
                                      ----------------------------


PETITIONER(S):
------------------------

                     A. JOY,SECRETARY,
                    MALSAYATHOZHILALI AVAKASA SAMRASHANA SAMITY,
                    REGISTER NO. Q 732/2011, VADI, KACHERI (PO),
                    KOLLAM DISTRICT, RESIDING AT PANTHAL VEEDU PURAYIDAM,
                    KAIKULANGARA WEST, KOLLAM DISTRICT.


                     BY ADV. SRI.N.SUNIL JOSEPH.

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------

        1.           STATE OF KERALA,
                     REPRESENTED BY SECRETARYTO THE GOVERNMENT
                     DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SUPPLIES,
                     GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
                     THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.

        2.           THE DIRECTOR OF CIVIL SUPPLIES,
                     OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF CIVIL SUPPLIES,
                     THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.

        3.           THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER,
                     OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT SUPPLYOFFICER,
                     CIVIL STATION, KOLLAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT- 691 013.

        4.           THE TALUK SUPPLYOFFICER,
                     OFFICE OF THE TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER,
                     KOLLAM TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT- 691 013.

        5.           THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
                     COLLECTORATE, KOLLAM,
                     KOLLAM DISTRICT- 691 013.

WP(C).No. 22370 of 2017 (U)




    6.       THE DISTRICT MANAGER
             MATSYAFED DISTRICT OFFICE,
             MARIYALAYAM BUILDING,
             SAKTHIKULANGARA (PO), KOLLAM -691 581.


             R1 TO R5 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. S. KANNAN.
             R6 BY SRI.T.P.PRADEEP, SC.


            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
            ON 06-07-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
            FOLLOWING:
rs.

WP(C).No. 22370 of 2017 (U)

                                APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-


EXHIBIT P1  TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO. A2-8150/2008 DT. 06.05.2008
            ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P2  TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT FURNISHED BY THE
            3RD RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3  TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT.16.05.2017 FILED
            BEFORE THE 6TH RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P4  TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE
            6TH RESPONDENT DT.16.05.2017.

EXHIBIT P5  TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BEFORE THE
            6TH RESPONDENT ON 12.06.2017.


RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:-       NIL.




                                               //TRUE COPY//


                                               P.S.TO JUDGE


rs.



                   P.B. SURESH KUMAR, J.

            ------------------------------------------

                 W.P.(C) No.22370 of 2017

            ------------------------------------------

            Dated this the 6th day of July, 2017


                          JUDGMENT

Ext.P4 is a representation preferred by the petitioner before the fifth respondent concerning the activities at the kerosene outlet run by Matsyafed within the Thankassery Fishery Harbour. The limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, when this matter was taken up for admission, is for a direction to the fifth respondent to take a decision on Ext.P4 representation.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader. W.P.(C) No.22370 of 2017 -2-

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing the fifth respondent to take a decision on Ext.P4 representation, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

P.B. SURESH KUMAR JUDGE bpr