Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Nisha Kumari vs The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance ... on 26 March, 2019

Author: Vikash Jain

Bench: Vikash Jain

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16860 of 2019
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2018 Thana- BEERPUR District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Nisha Kumari aged about 41 years (Female) D/O- Bhuvneshwar Prasad
                 Srivastava, W/o - Niranjan Kumar Sinha, Resident of Village Bhawanandpur,
                 P.S.- Birpur, District - Begusarai

                                                                        ... ... Petitioner
                                               Versus
                 The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance Investigation Bureau, Muzffarpur
                 Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner       :        Mr. Nakul Kumar Jamuar, Advocate
                 For the Vigilance        :        Mr. Anjani Kumar, Sr. Advocate
                                                   Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   26-03-2019

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Vigilance Department.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest for the offences alleged under Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) and 34 of the IPC registered in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 101 of 2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated on the accusation that she has got employment as Panchayat Teacher on the basis of forged certificate and marksheet of Bihar School Examination Board, which on verification by the authorities was found not to have been issued by the Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. A statement is made at the Bar that the petitioner has since been dismissed from service. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Learned counsel for the Vigilance Department opposes the anticipatory bail petition, submitting that this is out and out a case of fraud as the petitioner produced the forged certificate in the name of Akhilesh Kumar Singh.

5. Be that it may, in the event of petitioner's arrest or Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16860 of 2019(2) dt.26-03-2019 2/2 surrender within four weeks hereof let the above named petitioner be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- [ten thousand] with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM Ist, Begusarai in connection with Birpur P.S. Case No. 101 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and also with further conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make herself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(iv) The petitioner shall be well represented in Court on each and every date during trial except as and when directed by the learned Court to be present physically present, and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, her bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

6. The provisional bail shall be confirmed upon verification that the petitioner has been dismissed from service.

7. The authorities shall be at liberty to take steps for recovery of the salary already drawn by the petitioner during his employment as Panchayat Teacher.

BT/-                                                                        (Vikash Jain, J)

U      T