Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 3]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

M/S. Steel Authority Of India Ltd. Iisco ... vs Union Of India & Ors on 9 January, 2020

Author: Arindam Sinha

Bench: Arindam Sinha

                                                        1

09.01.2020
    ap
    26
                              W. P. 11870 (W) of 2019
                                     (Assigned)

                    M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd. IISCO Plant, Burnpur
                                         Vs.
                                    Union of India & Ors.

                               Mr. Rahul Tangri
                                Ms. Sushmita Shekhar
                                       ... For petitioner.

                                 Mr. Abhratosh Majumder, A.A.G.,
                                 Mr. Soumitra Mukherjee
                                 Mr. Avra Majumder
                                       ... For State.

                                 Mr. Tapan Bhanja
                                       ... For Union of India.


                  Mr. Tangri, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and relies on

             paragraphs 3 and 25 in judgment dated 28th August, 2019 of a Division Bench of High

             Court of Jharkhand in several writ petitions and connected applications therein [W.P. (T)

             no. 6048 of 2017 Tata Steel Limited, Jamshedpur vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.

             along with other writ petitions]. He submits, writ petitioners before that Court were also

             those engaged in manufacturing process and thereby bulk purchasers of High Speed

             Diesel (HSD). They are entitled to have issued From - 'C' was held by the judgment. Mr.

             Majumder, learned senior advocate, Additional Advocate General appears on behalf of

             State and submits, purchase of HSD by petitioner is for running vehicles. It is not entitled

             to issuance of the form.
                                           2

       Impugned communication dated 6th May, 2019 quotes a judgment of Punjab and

 Haryana High Court in CWP no. 29437 of 2017 (Capro Power Limited vs. State of

 Haryana and others). A sentence from the quote is extracted and reproduced below: -

              "... The purchase of the said goods for purposes of re-sale, use in the

           manufacture or processing of goods for sale, in the tele-communications

           network or mining or in generation or distribution of electricity or any other

           form of power would qualify the purchaser for registration under Section 7(2) of

           the CST Act. ..."

Understanding of the authority of the quote in the judgment is in the following paragraph of

  the communication, which is also quoted below: -

              ... After the amendment of section 2 (d) of the CST Act, a registered dealer is

           entitled to get Form "C" for the purchase of six goods mentioned therein as well

           as for use in manufacture of these goods. Besides this, as per provisions of

           section 8(3)(b), these six goods can also be purchased against Form "C" fur use

           in the telecommunications network or mining or in generation or distribution of

           electricity or any other form of power.       This may include generation of

           electricity for captive power plant."




 Provision in clause (b), sub-section (2) of section 8, Central Sales Taxes Act, 1956 is

 reproduced below: -

        "8...
                                           3

      3) 4[The goods referred to in sub-section
      ( 1),]
         [(a) ***]

               (b) 6[***] are goods of the classes specified in the certificate of registration

               of the registered dealer purchasing the goods as being intended for re-sale

               by him or subject to any rules made by the Central Government in this

               behalf, for use by him in the manufacture or processing of goods for sale or

               7 [in the telecommunications network or] in mining or in the generation or

               distribution of electricity or any other form of power;" ....

               (c)

               (d) etc."

While petitioner urges interpretation of the above clause as applicable to a registered

dealer purchasing the goods being intended for use by him in the manufacturing or

processing of goods for sale, submission on behalf of respondents is that high speed

diesel, as an item of specified goods, is used by petitioner to run vehicles.

Parties will be heard further on adjourned date. List on 16th January, 2020.

(Arindam Sinha, J.)