Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Raj Kumar vs Ramnarayan on 10 August, 2015

                                                                                                    1

                            S.A. No.559/2005
10.08.2015
        Shri Sandeep Koch                                 l                 C               f
t   ap
        He         o admiss
        C               subm                 t            ap                o t         o
tena        ha bee          adm                  i    t            s         que                o
law a               i   t           p                ap                H     ref                t
S.A. No.558/2005
               o Al                           Ku
                                              k                    Vs. R
and p              t        p             ap                   b al             adm
        Shri V.K. Vyas, ap                                     o       behalf o Shri
K             l             C                    p             f       ti       o behalf
o resp
        Howev           I find t                 ap                ca       b    adm
f   final he                o t          s            que                   i law.
        Th     ap           is, t                              adm                 o        t
follo             sub                   que                   o law:
             1.

Whe t low ap C wa righ i holding t t ap bef i had a righ t in and c w t ev su

2. Whe t low ap C wa j i holding t i ab o all tr t su a in wa m 2 C f t ap i directed t pay f p o admiss reg resp by regi a a well a o mod w a week. Not b m ret w tw weeks. Fail t pay t s w t ti s abov and t ap shall b dismis w ref t t C Li aft s o not o t resp al w S.A. No.558/2005.

(Mrs. S.R. Waghmare) Judge Jyoti