Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Karnataka High Court

Smt. Sampangamma vs The Assistant Commissioner on 24 September, 2018

Author: G.Narendar

Bench: G. Narendar

                              1




   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

     DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2018

                            BEFORE

         THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G. NARENDAR

     WRIT PETITION NO.21489/2018 (KLR-RES)

BETWEEN:

1. Smt. Sampangamma
   Age 55 years
   D/o Late Munishamappa
   W/o Krishnappa
   R/o Doddakurubarahalli village
   Channarayapatna Hobli
   Devanahalli Taluk
   Bengaluru Rural District

2. Sri Sampangi Ramaiah
   Age 52 years

3. Sri M. Rajanna
   Age 50 years

4. Sri M. Srinivas
   Age 48 years

P2 to P4 are sons of
Late Munishamappa

Petitioner Nos.2 to 4 are
R/o Arasanahalli village
Nandi Hobli
Chikkaballapura Taluk
& District, PIN: 562 101                ...Petitioners

(By Sri K.Somasekhar Reddy, Advocate)
                               2




AND:

1. The Assistant Commissioner
   Chikkaballapura Sub Division
   Chikkaballapura
   Chikkaballapura District
   Pin Code : 562 101

2. Tahsildar
   Chikkaballapura Taluk
   Chikkaballapura
   Chikkaballapura District
   Pin Code : 562 101

3. Sri Nagi Reddy
   Age 45 years
   S/o Venkatareddy
   R/at No.40, II Cross
   Bhuvaneshwari Nagar
   C.V.Raman Nagar
   Bengaluru - 560 093

4. The Deputy Commissioner
   Chikkaballapura District
   Chikkaballapura
   Pin Code : 562 101                       ...Respondents

(By Smt. R.Anitha, HCGP for R1, R2 & R4)

     This writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of
the Constitution of India praying to set-aside the order at
Annexure-A passed on 23.04.2018 by the Deputy
Commissioner, Chikkaballapura District, Chikkaballapura in
RA No.15/2016-17 and direct the Court below to 1st
respondent order in RA (CHIK) No.50/2014-15 dated
07.08.2015 is confirmed in favour of petitioners.

      This Writ Petition coming on for orders this day, the
Court made the following:
                             3




                        ORDER

Memo is preferred by the learned counsel for the petitioners and counter signed by the petitioners, seeking to withdraw the petition.

Memo is taken on record. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

JUDGE Kmv