Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi

Arvind Gautam vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 4 August, 2015

      

  

   

                CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL BENCH

                             O.A. No. 2137/2013

                This the 4th day of August, 2015

HONBLE MR. SUDHIR KUMAR, MEMBER (A)
HONBLE MR. RAJ VIR Sharma, MEMBER (J)

Arvind Gautam
S/o Shri V.K.Gautam,
R/o 45/2, Gali No.17,
East Azad  Nagar,
Delhi-110051.             			            .     Applicant

(By Advocate : Shri Vishnu Sharma)

			Versus

1.	Govt. of NCT of Delhi
	Through Chief Secretary,
	Delhi Administration,
	Near ITO, New Delhi

2.	The Commissioner of Police
	Police Head Quarters,
	I.T.O. New Delhi

3.	Staff Selection Commission,
	Through Secretary,
	CGO Complex,
	Lodhi Road, New Delhi.                      ..  Respondents

   (By Advocate : Shri S.M. Arif-3)
                          ASI Salauddin, Delhi Police
                          Deptt. rep. on behalf of
                          Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.)

                                ORDER

Per Sudhir Kumar, Member(A):

Heard the learned counsel for both sides.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that after the Select List has been re-drawn in compliance of the orders of this Tribunal dated 17.09.2014 in OA No. 1812/2013 with OA No. 1261/2014, now the applicant has also come into the Select List, and is within the zone of consideration, and, therefore, the relief as prayed for, has already accrued to him indirectly, through the orders of this Tribunal dated 17.09.2014 in the above two OAs. Accordingly, it has been prayed that this OA may be dismissed as having become infructuous.

3. Learned Counsel for the applicant agrees, and concedes that relief has since been made available to the applicant, by inclusion of his name in the Select List. Therefore, the OA is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.

(Raj Vir Sharma)                                            (Sudhir Kumar)
   Member(J)                                                    Member(A)


/sarita/