Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Gujarat High Court

Movaliya Bhikhubhai Balabhai vs Income Tax Officer - Tds - 1 - Surat & on 30 March, 2016

Author: Harsha Devani

Bench: Harsha Devani, G.R.Udhwani

                 C/SCA/17944/2015                                             ORDER




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                    SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17944 of 2015

         ================================================================
                   MOVALIYA BHIKHUBHAI BALABHAI....Petitioner(s)
                                     Versus
              INCOME TAX OFFICER - TDS - 1 - SURAT & 1....Respondent(s)
         ================================================================
         Appearance:
         KUSHAL V. TIMBADIA, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
         MR TUSHAR L SHETH, ADVOCATE for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
         MR HARDIK VORA, ASSTT. GOVT PLEADER for the Respondent No. 2
         MR SUDHIR M MEHTA, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         ================================================================

          CORAM: HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI
                 and
                 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.UDHWANI

                                    Date : 30/03/2016


                                     ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)

1. Heard Mr. Tushar Sheth, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Sudhir Mehta, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondent No.1.

2. Having regard to the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the respective parties, the court is of the view that the matter requires consideration. Hence, Issue Rule. Mr. Sudhir Mehta, learned Senior Standing Counsel waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent No.1. Mr. Hardik Vora, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule on Page 1 of 2 HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Thu Mar 31 01:19:04 IST 2016 C/SCA/17944/2015 ORDER behalf of the respondent No.2.

3. Having regard to the controversy involved in the present case, which lies in a very narrow compass and with the consent of the learned advocates for the parties, the matter was taken up for final hearing today.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties.

5. Arguments are concluded. Matter to be posted for dictation of judgment on 31st March, 2016.

(HARSHA DEVANI, J.) (G.R.UDHWANI, J.) parmar* Page 2 of 2 HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Thu Mar 31 01:19:04 IST 2016