Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Dr. Vikas Kanaujia vs Dr. Sarita on 14 August, 2017

Bench: Prafulla C. Pant, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

                                                       1

     ITEM NO.10                                 COURT NO.11                       SECTION XI

                                     S U P R E M E C O U R T O F             I N D I A
                                             RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                            No(s).   19977/2017

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 19-05-2017
     in FA No. 31/2007 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At
     Allahabad)

     DR. VIKAS KANAUJIA                                                           Petitioner(s)

                                                             VERSUS

     DR. SARITA                                                                   Respondent(s)


     (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.69011/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING
     C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.69007/2017-PERMISSION TO
     FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS)


     Date : 14-08-2017 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT
                               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL


     For Petitioner(s)                   Mr.   Manoj   Swarup, Adv.
                                         Mr.   Ankit   Swarup, Adv.
                                         Ms.   Tanya   Swarup, Adv.
                                         Mr.   Anand   Prakash Paul, Adv.
                                         Mr.   Mukul   Kumar, AOR

     For Respondent(s)


                                UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                   O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

We are not inclined to interfere with the interlocutory order passed by the High Court. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by SONALI SAUND with Date: 2017.08.16 17:04:04 IST the observation that the observation in “para 2” of the Reason: impugned order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties, which reads as follows:

2
“Perused the judgment of the court below. The grounds on which the divorce has been granted are very thin. Although he alleges cruelty but no real case of cruelty has been made out against him by the wife. It seems that the husband requires some counselling.” Pending applications stand disposed of.
  (SONALI SAUND)                              (S.S.R. KRISHNA)
SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT                      ASST.REGISTRAR