Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Kerala High Court

Biju Joseph vs The State Of Kerala on 10 August, 2002

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                          PRESENT:

                      THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

             WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2016/16TH POUSHA, 1937

                                 WP(C).No. 21968 of 2015 (U)
                                    ----------------------------

PETITIONER:
------------------

            BIJU JOSEPH, AGED 42 YEARS
            HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHER (PHYSICS)
            GOVT. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL
            MALOTH KASBA, VALLIKKADAVU P.O.
            KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN 671 533.

            BY ADVS.SRI.MURALI PALLATH
                       SRI.MAHESH V RAMAKRISHNAN
                       SRI.JAPA BALAN OLIVER

RESPONDENTS:
-----------------------

        1. THE STATE OF KERALA
            REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
            GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT (ANNEX)
           THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695 001.

        2. THE DIRECTOR
            HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
            HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 001.

        3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR
            HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
            REGIONAL OFFICE, KANNUR, PAYYAMBALAM P.O.
            KANNUR, PIN - 670 002.

        4. THE PRINCIPAL
            ST. JUDES HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, VELLARIKKUNDU
            KASARAGOD DISTRICT, PIN - 671 533.

        5. THE PRINCIPAL
            NIRMALA HIGHER SCONDARY SCHOOL, CHEMPERI
            KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670 632.




                                                                    [CONTD....]

WP(C).No. 21968 of 2015 (U)            2

    6. THE CORPORATE MANAGER
       THE CORPORATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY
       ARCHDIOCESE OF TAHALSSERY, THALASSERY P.O.
       KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN- 670 101.

       BY ADV. SRI.BENNY GERVACIS
       BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE

       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06-01-2016,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 21968 of 2015 (U)


                                            APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-
-----------------------------------

EXT.P1               -         COPY OF ORDER NO. ACD.B3/19284/HSE/02 DATED 10/08/2002.

EXT.P2               -         COPY OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 29/07/2008 ISSUED BY THE
                               6TH RESPONDENT.

EXT.P3               -         COPY OF ORDER NO. ACD B3.19259/HSE/01 DATED 14/08/2008
                               ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P4               -         COPY OF LETTER DATED 11/01/2012 ISSUED BY THE 2ND
                               RESPONDENT.

EXT.P5-                        COPY OF COMPLAINT PETITION DATED 10.08.2013 SUBMITTED
                               BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPNODENT.

EXT.P5               -         COPY OF LETTER DATED 01/11/2014.

EXT.P7               -         COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 16/04/2015
                               SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL
---------------------------------------


                                                              //TRUE COPY//


                                                              P.A. TO JUDGE


sp



             K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
       ----------------------------------
          W.P(C). No.21968 of 2015-U
       ----------------------------------
    Dated this the 6th day of January, 2016

                   JUDGMENT

The writ petition highlights the peculiar circumstance in which the petitioner, who worked as an HSST (Junior) (Physics) in the 4th respondent School, has raised a claim for the salary payable during that period.

2. The petitioner had been appointed as an HSST(Physics) on 11.08.2000 at the St.Jude's Higher Secondary School, Vellarikundu, Kasaragod under the respondent Corporate Management. The same was found to be overlooking the seniority of one Lizy Thomas, who was working in St.Sebastian's Higher W.P(C). No.21968 of 2015-U 2 Secondary School, Velimanam, Kannur. In such circumstance, the Corporate Management appointed Smt.Lizy Thomas as HSST (Physics) in St.Jude's Higher Secondary School, Vellarikundu, Kasaragod with effect from 11.08.2000 to 04.07.2001 and Sri.Biju Joseph was retrospectively given appointment as HSST (Junior) (Physics) in the said period

3. Subsequently, he was transferred as HSST (Physics) in St.Sebastian's Higher Secondary School, Velimanam, Kannur under the very same Corporate Management. While the approval of appointment of the petitioner was pending before the Educational Authorities, the petitioner is said to have obtained an employment under the Government, upon which, he left the services under the Corporate W.P(C). No.21968 of 2015-U 3 Management on 21.01.2002.

4. The petitioner's appointment was approved by Ext.P3. But however, the claim for salary was declined between 11.08.2000 to 04.07.2001 by Ext.P3 order dated 14.08.2008. Subsequently, by Ext.P4 dated 11.01.2012, the claim for salary for the above period was also admitted by the Government. The petitioner is before this Court, claiming disbursement of the salary due to him as HSST (Junior) between 11.08.2000 to 04.07.2001 and as HSST between 05.07.2001 to 21.01.2002.

5. The learned Government Pleader submits on instructions that the Bills submitted by the 4th respondent were defective and that the Principal has also not forwarded the Service Book of the petitioner. The learned counsel W.P(C). No.21968 of 2015-U 4 appearing for respondents 4 to 6 would contend that till date, they have not received any communication as to any defects noticed in the Bills. It is also submitted that the Service Book was not opened, since the petitioner's appointment was pending approval and the same was approved only by Ext.P3 dated 14.08.2008, by which time, the petitioner had gone out of service. It is only in such circumstance, that a Service Book had not been opened by the Principal.

6. Whatever the circumstance, the petitioner, who had worked, cannot be denied the salary between 11.08.2000 and 21.01.2002, especially when his appointment has been approved by the educational authorities and the salary claim also admitted as per Ext.P4 for W.P(C). No.21968 of 2015-U 5 the entire period. Hence, if any defect is noticed in any of the Bills sent by the Principal, then the 3rd respondent shall intimate the same to the Principal within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. The Principal shall, if so intimated, cure the defects and open a Service Book and forward the same to the 3rd respondent. If no defects are intimated, immediately after the expiry of the two weeks' period, the Principal shall open a Service Book and send it to the 3rd respondent so as to enable disbursement of the salary due to the petitioner. The entire exercise by the 3rd respondent shall be completed within three months from the date of receipt of the Service Book by the 3rd respondent and the salary due W.P(C). No.21968 of 2015-U 6 disbursed.

The writ petition would stand allowed. No costs.

Sd/-

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE.

//True Copy// P.A. to Judge.

sp/06/01/16