Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 6]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Umesh Kumar Dogra vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Another on 19 February, 2015

Author: Rajiv Sharma

Bench: Rajiv Sharma

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

                                                                          CWP No. 1274/2015
                                                                         Decided on 19.2.2015
    Umesh Kumar Dogra                                                      ................Petitioner




                                                                                          .

                                                  Versus


    State of Himachal Pradesh and another                                    ..........Respondents





    Coram
    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge
    Whether approved for reporting?1


    For the Petitioner

    For the Respondents :
                                r  :


                                         Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate.

                                         Mr. M.A. Khan, Additional Advocate
                                         General with Mr. N.K. Sharma, Deputy

                                         Advocate General for the respondent-
                                         State.

                                         None for respondent No. 2.



    Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral):

Learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner has been transferred on the basis of a DO note No. 207057 dated 24.1.2015. His statement is taken on record.

2. In these circumstances, we find that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in CWP No. 801 of 2013 titled as Sanjay Kumar vs. State of HP & Others, decided on 5.7.2013. We accordingly quash and set aside transfer order dated 12.2.2015 (Annexure P-4) and dated 16.2.2015 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 17:36:29 :::HCHP 2

(Annexure P-5), so far they effect the transfer of the petitioner. We leave it open to the respondents to transfer the petitioner in accordance with law. Petition stands disposed of.

.

All pending miscellaneous applications also stand disposed of.

Copy dasti.

(Rajiv Sharma) Vacation Judge February 19, 2015 (vikrant) ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 17:36:29 :::HCHP