Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Bhal Singh vs State Of Haryana And Others on 30 July, 2013

Author: Rajiv Narain Raina

Bench: Rajiv Narain Raina

           CWP No.16740 of 2001 (O&M)                                                          1



            IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH


                                                              CWP No.16740 of 2001(O & M)
                                                                Date of Decision:30.07.2013

           Bhal Singh, Turner Haryana Roadways Depot, Jind

                                                                             ......... Petitioners
                                                Versus

           State of Haryana and others

                                                                         ............ Respondents


           CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA

           Present:             Mr. Ram Niwas Sharma, Advocate
                                for the petitioner.

                                Mr. Harish Rathee, Sr. DAG, Haryana

                                      ****

                      1.        To be referred to the reporters or not?
                      2.        Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?


           RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J.

The claim, in this petition, is by an Assistant Turner serving in Haryana Rodaways, Jind Depot at the time of presentation of the writ petition in the year 2001. The complaint is that the petitioner has been denied the pay scale of Rs.480-760 with effect from 1.2.1981 vide impugned order dated 12.5.2000. The first appointment of the petitioner to Government service on 15.12.1976 as an Assistant Turner was made in the pay scale of Rs.100-160. The pay scale of Rs.480-760 was given only to those employees who were in the pay scale of Rs.120-250 and 140-250. The claim is based on the ground that the petitioner is a matriculate with 2 years ITI certificate in the trade and has been discharging the duties of technical Kumar Paritosh 2013.08.07 11:08 I agree to specified portions of this document CWP No.16740 of 2001 (O&M) 2 nature. The petitioner actually wants that his initial scale of Rs.100-160 should be treated as Rs.120-250 and 140-250 (unrevised). By this logic, he claims the benefit of further revision in pay scale of Rs.1200-2040 with effect from 1.1.1986 which is the corresponding scale to scale revision from Rs.480-760. He claims that such benefit should be given with consequential benefits of Assured Career Progression Scheme as notified by Haryana Government on 7.1.1988 after completion of 20 years of regular and satisfactory service as on 15.12.1986.

The petitioner's entry into service was through the employment exchange. He came to be appointed vide order dated 15.10.1986 (P-2) as Assistant Turner/Assistant Tyre-Man in the pay scale of Rs.100-4-140-5- 160 with effect from 1.12.1986 on purely temporary basis for a period of 6 months. Their services were liable to be terminated any time without prior notice. The appointment order was issued by the General Manager, Haryana Roadways, Hisar.

In response to the writ petition, the respondents have contested the case by filing a written statement. The defence taken is that the minimum educational qualifications laid down for the post of Assistant Turner was not matriculate with 2 years ITI certificate. If the petitioner was over qualified for appointment, then there is no provision in law, on the basis of which, the petitioner would be entitled to pay scale of posts, for which, the minimum educational qualifications laid down was matriculate with 2 years ITI certificate. The revision of pay scale for technical posts apply only where the pre-revised scale was Rs.120-240 and Rs.140-240. The petitioner having been appointed in the pay scale of Rs.100-160 and having accepted this position from 1976, cannot claim higher pay scale or Kumar Paritosh 2013.08.07 11:08 I agree to specified portions of this document CWP No.16740 of 2001 (O&M) 3 revision to bring his pay scale at Rs.480-760 (unrevised).

Mr. Ram Niwas Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner relies on an order dated 30.3.1992 (P-3) which deals with the subject of revision of pay scales. This decision of Government of Haryana was taken with the view to re-construct the standard pay scale with effect from 1.4.1979. A table was inserted in the circular which appears thus :

                          "From                                     To
                          300-5-400/10-430                          300-5-360/8-400/10-430
                          350-5-400/10-500                          350-5-360-8-400/10-500
                          420-10490/525-15-600-EB-20-               420-10-490/540-15-600-EB-20-
                          700                                       700
                          450-10-490/525-15-600-20-700              450-10-490/540-15-600-20-700"




The petitioner specifically relies on para 3 of the Annexure to the circular which reads thus : -

"3. Technical posts in various 120-250 460-600 480-760 departments for which minimum 140-250 420-700 educational qualification prescribed is Matric with 2 years I.T.I. Certificate 1.2.1981 Therefore, only such technical posts, for which, the minimum educational qualification prescribed is Matric with 2 years ITI certificate were revised from 120-240 to 460-600 and then 480-760.
Mr. Harish Rathee, learned Sr. DAG, Haryana appearing for the State refers to page 629 of the Haryana Government Notification dated 29.2.1980 promulgating the Haryana Civil Services (Revised Scale of Pay) Rules, 1980 where the posts in the Transport Department, Haryana have been dealt with. Entry 10 in the column of the Transport Department reads Kumar Paritosh 2013.08.07 11:08 I agree to specified portions of this document CWP No.16740 of 2001 (O&M) 4 as follows : -
Assistant Fitter, Assistant 100-160 350-500 Electrician, Assistant Carpenter, Assistant Welder, Assistant 10 Painter, Assistant Tyreman, Assistant Black Smith, Assistant Radiator Repairer, Assistant Turner, Assistant Tin Smith, Assistant Upholster, Assistant Battery Attendant, Assistant Tyre and Tube Repairer The pay scale prescribed for Assistant Fitter, Assistant Turner, Assistant Tyreman etc. have been fixed at Rs.100-160 (existing pay scale) and Rs.350-500 (as the revised pay scales). Therefore, the pay scale which of Rs.100-160 on pay revision from scale to scale in 1988 was Rs.350-500, which the petitioner got. The petitioner's claim for grant of pay scale of Rs.480-760 (revised) based on extra qualifications earned before appointment but beyond the prescribed pay scale of the post is not legally tenable.

For the foregoing reasons, there is no merit in the this petition which fails and is dismissed.

           July 30, 2013                                      (RAJIV NARAIN RAINA)
           Paritosh Kumar                                              JUDGE




Kumar Paritosh
2013.08.07 11:08
I agree to specified portions
of this document