Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 5]

Chattisgarh High Court

Smt. Gajendra Rathore vs State Of Chhattisgarh 9 Wpcr/296/2019 ... on 7 May, 2019

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                        1

                                                                            NAFR

                 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                            WPCR No. 298 of 2019

      Smt. Gajendra Rathore W/o Sri Devendra Kumar Rathore, Aged About 55
      Years R/o Chittarpara, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh At Present R/o
      Ne-159 Cseb Colony, Korba, (East), District- Korba, Chhattisgarh.

                                                                    ---- Petitioner

                                     Versus

   1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through-Secretary, Home Department, Mahanadi
      Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

   2. Inspector General Of Police, Neharu Chowk, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur,
      Chhattisgarh.

   3. Superintendent Of Police, Janjgir-Champa, District- Janjgir-Champa,
      Chhattisgarh.

   4. Superintendent Of Police, Korba, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh.

   5. Station House Officer, Police Station- Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa,
      Chhattisgarh.

   6. Station House Officer, Police Station- Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa,
      Chhattisgarh.

   7. Smt. Laxmi Tiwari W/o Bhuwan Lal Tiwari Aged About 63 Years R/o Ward
      No. 8, Shankar Nagar, Janjgir, Near House Of Ward Councilor ( Parshad)
      Ram Kumar Yadav, Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh.

                                                                 ----Respondents

For Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Guha, Advocate For State : Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 07/05/19

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition (criminal) with liberty to file application under 2 Section 156 (3), 190/200 of the Cr.P.C. before the jurisdictional Criminal Court.

2. Liberty is granted, as prayed for. If such an application is moved by the petitioner, the jurisdictional Criminal Court is expected to consider and decide that application/complaint in accordance with law expeditiously.

3. With the aforesaid observations, this writ petition (criminal) stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Harneet